摘要
诈骗类案件中,嫌疑人(被告人)到案后往往会采取翻供的形式逃避法律制裁。由于此类案件本身的特殊性,嫌疑人一旦翻供,容易导致检察机关案件审查及庭审环节陷入困境。从理想层面分析,改变"口供至上"办案模式是应对翻供的最有效途径,但从现实角度来看,研究并充分运用证据的收集、审查判断以及出庭指控技巧不失为一条有效路径。
In cases of Defrauding Crime, the Suspects (the Defendant) often try to escape legal sanctions in the form of testimony retraction after appearing in court. Due to the special nature of such cases, once the suspects retracted, it easily leads to a review of the case and the court hearing of the procuratorial organs in trouble. From the ideal view of analysis, the most effective way to deal with the testimony retraction is to change the "the confession first" mode for handling such cases, but in reality, an effective solution is to do research and make full use of the collection of evidences, review and do judgment, and use allegations skills in the court.
出处
《犯罪研究》
2012年第5期44-52,共9页
Chinese Criminology Review
关键词
诈骗
翻供
困境
对策
defrauding
testimony retraction
dilemma
countermeasure