期刊文献+

大地电磁面积性资料和稀疏测线资料的三维反演解释 被引量:4

3D Interpretation of Magnetotelluric Sparse Survey Lines Data and Dense 3D Grid Data
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对理论模型合成的稀疏测线数据和面积性数据以及实测单一测线数据进行了三维反演。通过对比分析合成稀疏测线数据和面积性数据的三维反演结果发现,使用4个张量阻抗元素作为反演数据的稀疏测线数据的三维反演结果可以较好地反映三维目标体,虽然效果可能不如面积性数据的三维反演结果。实测单一测线数据的三维反演结果也较好地揭示测线周围地下基岩界面的三维起伏情况。合成数据和实测资料的三维反演结果表明:可以采用三维反演解释的方法对大地电磁稀疏测线资料进行反演解释。同时,从合成数据的三维反演结果分析可以看出,对大地电磁稀疏测线资料进行三维反演,应尽可能反演所有张量数据;对大地电磁面积性资料进行三维反演,可以只使用两个非对角元素数据,但使用所有张量数据的效果更好。 We inverted the synthetic sparse survey lines data and dense 3D grid data generated from the test models and the field single line data.From the comparison between the 3D inversion results of synthetic sparse survey lines data and the 3D inversion results of dense 3D grid data,it is found that the 3D inversion results of synthetic sparse survey lines data can recover the 3D target although the effect is not as good as the 3D inversion results of dense 3D grid data.The 3D inversion results of the field single line data well reflect the 3D information of the bedrock interface underground near the survey line.The 3D inversion results show that it is possible to interpret MT sparse survey lines data using 3D inversion method.From the analysis of 3D inversion results from the synthetic data,all the tensor elements are suggested to be used in 3D inversion to interpret the sparse survey lines data and two off-diagonal elements can be used in 3D inversion to interpret the dense 3D grid data,while the results are better when all the tensor elements are used.
出处 《现代地质》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期1185-1192,共8页 Geoscience
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划("863")项目(2007AA09Z310) 国家自然科学基金项目(41004028) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(2010ZY53) 教育部新世纪优秀人才计划项目
关键词 大地电磁 三维反演 张量数据 magnetotelluric 3D inversion tensor element
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1魏文博.我国大地电磁测深新进展及瞻望[J].地球物理学进展,2002,17(2):245-254. 被引量:183
  • 2胡祖志,胡祥云,何展翔.三维大地电磁数据的二维反演解释[J].石油地球物理勘探,2005,40(3):353-359. 被引量:14
  • 3陈小斌,赵国泽,马霄.大地电磁三维模型的一维二维反演近似问题研究[J].工程地球物理学报,2006,3(1):9-15. 被引量:18
  • 4Ledo J, Queralt P, Marti A, et al. Two-dimensional interpreta-tion of three-dimensional magnetotelluric data : an example of lim-itation and resolution [ J ]. Geophysical Journal International,2002,150: 127 -139.
  • 5Ledo J. 2-D versus 3-D magnetotelluric data interpretation [ J].Surveys in Geophysics,2005 , 26: 511 - 543.
  • 6何展翔,贺振华,王绪本,孔繁恕.油气非地震勘探技术的发展趋势[J].地球物理学进展,2002,17(3):473-479. 被引量:31
  • 7Smith J T,Booker J R. Rapid inversion of two- and three-dimen-sional magnetotelluric data [ J ]. Journal of Geophysical Re-search, 1991, 96: 3905 -3922.
  • 8Mackie R L,Madden T R. Three-dimensional magnetotelluric in-version using conjugate gradients [ J ]. Geophysical Journal Inter-national, 1993,115: 215 -229.
  • 9Newman G A, Alumbaugh D L. Three-dimensional magnetotellu-ric inversion using non-linear conjugate gradients [ J]. Geophysi-cal Journal International, 2000, 140: 410 -424.
  • 10Spichak V, Popova I V. Artificial neural network inversion ofmagnetotelluric data in terms of three-dimensional earth macropa-rameters [J]. Geophysical Journal International, 2000, 142 : 15-26.

二级参考文献129

共引文献424

同被引文献70

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部