期刊文献+

超声刀痔切除术治疗重度脱垂性混合痔的临床研究 被引量:5

Clinical research of the harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy in treatment of severe prolapse mixed hemorrhoids
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨超声刀痔切除术在临床中应用的可行性和安全性。方法回顾性分析我院2011年3月—2012年3月收治的78例重度脱垂性混合痔住院手术患者,38例行超声刀痔切除术,40例行外剥内扎法痔切除术,比较两种手术方法的疗效。结果两组患者手术时间、术中出血量比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05、P<0.01);两组患者在术后尿潴留、术后疼痛比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);肛门坠肿、肛缘水肿比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论与外剥内扎法痔切除术比较,超声刀痔切除术具有手术时间短、出血少、术后并发症少等优点。 Objective To explore the feasibility and the safety of the clinical use of the harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy.Methods Seventy eight cases of severe prolapse mixed hemorrhoids in our hospital from March 2011 to March 2012 were analyzed retrospectively,38 of them underwent harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy and 40 of them were taken Milligan-Morgan operation,then compare the efficacy of the two operation.Results The difference of operating time and amount of bleeding between two groups showed statistical significance(P0.05,P0.01);there was no significant different in postoperation uroschesis and postoperation pain(P0.05),the difference of postoperation anus falling and bulge and anus margin edema showed statistical significance(P0.05).Conclusion Compared with the Milligan-Morgan,harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy exceed in operating time,amount of bleeding and the postoperation complication.
机构地区 解放军第
出处 《临床军医杂志》 CAS 2012年第5期1038-1039,共2页 Clinical Journal of Medical Officers
关键词 超声刀 外剥内扎法 重度脱垂性混合痔 harmonic scalpel Milligan-Morgan severe prolapse mixed hemorrhoids
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献2

共引文献459

同被引文献47

  • 1粟军,张志勇,何鹏云,张积青,李香琼.超声刀痔切除术与外剥内扎术治疗混合痔的疗效对比[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2005,8(2):177-178. 被引量:25
  • 2痔临床诊治指南(2006版)[J].中华胃肠外科杂志,2006,9(5):461-463. 被引量:2138
  • 3Franceschilli L,D'Ugo S,de Luca E, et al. Role of 0.4% glyeeryl trinitrate ointment after haemorrhoidectomy: results of a prospective randomised study[J]. Int J Coloreetal Dis, 2013, 28(3): 365-369.
  • 4Haas E,Onel E,Miller H, et al. A double-blind,random- ized,active-controlled study for post-hemorrhoidectomy pain management with liposomebupivacaine, a novel local analgesic formulation[J]. Am Surg, 2012,78( 5 ) : 574-581.
  • 5Perrotti P,Dominici P,Grossi E,et al. Topical nifedipine with lidocaine ointment versus active control for pain after hemorrhoidectomy: results of a muhicentre, prospective, randomized, double-blind study[J]. Can J Surg,2010,53( ! ) : 17-24.
  • 6Ferreira-Valente MA, Pais-Ribeiro JL, Jensen MP. Validity of four pain intensity rating scales[J]. Pain, 2011,152:2399- 2404.
  • 7Armstrong DN, Ambmze WL, Schertzer ME, et al. Harmonic Scalpel vs. electmcantery hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective evaluation[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2001,44:558-564.
  • 8Abo-hasem AA, Sarhan A, Aly AM. Hamonic Scalpel compared with bipolar electro-cautery hemorrhoidctomy : a randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Surg, 2010,8:243-247.
  • 9Fareed M, E1-Awady S, Abd-E1 monaem H, et al. Randomized trial comparing LigaSure to close Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy [ J ]. Tech Coloproctol, 2009,13 : 243-246.
  • 10杨向东,魏雨,颜景颖.痔PPH术常见并发症防治的研究进展[J].结直肠肛门外科,2008,14(2):127-131. 被引量:24

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部