期刊文献+

大学生专业选择差异多元视角的整合 被引量:3

Integration of Multiple Perspectives in Choice of College Majors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目前国内外学者们逐渐认识到研究和分析高校学生专业选择的重要性,并从个人智识视角、家庭社会经济地位及父母期望视角、学校教育和环境视角、性别视角、风险视角、社会结构视角进行了理论分析和实证研究。通过对前人研究进行综述,本文提出了大学生专业选择的整合视角,以期较为全面地把握专业选择的不同影响因素,为今后的研究提供深入分析的理论基础和依据。 The rising popularity of higher education has meant that choice of major has become more important to undergraduates, as it will influence their education path and career planning. Previous research has analyzed the choices of undergraduates from the perspectives of individual factors, family socio-economic status and parental expectations, university education and climate, gender, risk, and social structure. Based on this existing body of literature, this paper highlights the integration perspective to reveal the multiple factors and mechanisms that influence choice of major.
作者 王颖 石彤
出处 《中华女子学院学报》 2012年第5期55-61,共7页 Journal of China Women's University
基金 2010年国家社科基金重大招标项目"新时期中国妇女社会地位调查研究"(10@ZH020)的子课题"女大学生群体调查" 2010年教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目"女性高层次人才成长规律与发展对策研究"(10JZD0045-1)子项目"女性高层次后备人才成长规律与发展对策研究" 北京市共建项目"高等教育中专业选择的性别差异研究--北京高校学生专业选择的性别差异调查与分析"的成果之一
关键词 高等教育 专业选择 整合视角 higher education choice of major integration perspective
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1陆根书,刘珊,钟宇平.高等教育需求及专业选择中的性别差异及其影响因素分析[J].高等教育研究,2009,30(10):14-29. 被引量:47
  • 2郭丛斌,曾满超,丁小浩.中国高校理工类学生教育及就业状况的性别差异[J].高等教育研究,2007,28(11):89-101. 被引量:28
  • 3Simpson, J. C.. Segregated Differences by Subject: Racial Differences in the Factors Influencing Academic Major between Euro- pean Americans, Asian Americans, and African, Hispanic, and Native Americans[J]. Journal of Higher Education, 2001, (1).
  • 4Turner, S.E.& Bowen, W.G.. Choice of Major: The Changing (Unchanging) Gender Gap[J].Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1999,(2).
  • 5Jacobs,.J.A.. Gender Inequality in Higher Education[J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 1996,(22).
  • 6Gerber, T.P. & Cheung, S.Y.. Horizontal Stratification in Postsecondary Education: Forms, Explanations, and Implications[J]. Annum Review of Sociology, 2008,(34).
  • 7Jonsson, J.O.. Explaining Sex Differences in Educational Choice: an Empirical Assessment of a Rational Choice Model[J]. European Sociological Review, 1999,(4).
  • 8Xie,Y. & Shauman, K.A.. Women in Science: Career Processes and Outcomes[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.
  • 9Goyette, K.A. & Mullen, A.L.. Who Studies the Arts and Sciences? Social Background and the Choice and Consequences of Un- dergraduate Field of Study[J]. Journal of Higher Education, 2006,(3).
  • 10Van de Werfhorst, H.G. & Kraaykamp, G.. Four Field-related Educational Resources and Their Impact on Labor, Consumption, and Sociopolitical Orientation[J]. Sociology of Education, 2001,(4).

二级参考文献47

共引文献199

同被引文献28

引证文献3

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部