期刊文献+

可调压与非可调压分流管治疗脑积水的临床比较 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察临床上治疗脑积水中应用可调压与非可调压分流管之间的差别。方法 :通过对2004年8月-2012年6月于我院住院的28例脑积水患者进行脑室-腹腔分流术(V-P分流术),其中16例用可调压管,12例用非可调压管,进行两组结果间的比较。结果:可调压组和非可调压组的并发症发生率分别为12.50%和50.00%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.039 9)。可调压组和非可调压组的术后改善率分别为81.25%,66.67%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.327 5)。结论:可调压式分流管能有效解决V-P分流术后分流不足或过度的并发症,是治疗脑积水的首选方法。
出处 《南通大学学报(医学版)》 2012年第5期418-420,共3页 Journal of Nantong University(Medical sciences)
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Richards HK, Seeley HM, Pickard JD. Efficacy of antibiot- ic-impregnated shunt catheters in reducing shunt infection: data from the United Kingdom Shunt Registry[J]. J Neu- rosurg Pediatr, 2009, 4(4):389-393.
  • 2张强,高峰.脑积水脑室-腹腔分流术后主要并发症的研究进展[J].国际神经病学神经外科学杂志,2007,34(4):374-377. 被引量:39
  • 3李军立,马福东,李虎,朱光奎.腹腔镜引导下脑室-腹腔分流术治疗成人脑积水[J].中华神经外科杂志,2007,23(10):757-757. 被引量:8
  • 4Hertel F, Ztichner M, Decker C, et al. The miethke dual- switch valve: experience in 169 adult patients with differ- ent kinds of hydrocephalus: an open field study[J]. Min- im Invasive Neurosurg, 2008, 51(3):147-153.
  • 5Pattavilakom A, Xenos C, Bradfield O, et al. Reduction in shunt infection using antibiotic impregnated CSF shunt catheters: an Australian prospective study[J]. J Clin Neu- rosci, 2007, 14(6):526-531.
  • 6McGirt MJ, Buck DW 2nd, Sciubba D, et al. Adjustable vs set-pressure valves decrease the risk of proximal shunt ob- struction in the treatment of pediatric hydrocephalus [J]. Childs Nerv Syst, 2007, 23(3):289-295.
  • 7Guti6rrez-Gonz6_lez R, Boto GR. Do antibiotic-impregnated catheters prevent infeetion in CSF diversion procedures? Review of the literature[J]. J Infect, 2010, 61(1):9-20.
  • 8Kestle JR, Drake JM, Cochrane DD, et al. Lack of benefit of endoscopic ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion:a multi- center randomized trial[J]. J Neurosurg, 2003, 98(2):284- 290.

二级参考文献25

  • 1Cabezudo JM,Olabe J.Bacci F.Infection of intervenebral displace after placement of percutaneous lumboperitoneal for benign intracranial hypertention.Neurosurgery,1990,26(6):1005-1009.
  • 2Kestle J,Drake J,Milner R,et al.Long-term follow-up data from the Shunt Design Trial.Ped Neurosurg,2000,33(5):230-236.
  • 3Chernov MF,Kamikawa S,Yamane F,et al.Neurofiberscope-guided management of slit-ventricle syndrome due shunt placement.J Neurosurg-(Pediatrics3),2005,102 (3 suppl):260-267.
  • 4Del Bigio MR.Biological reactions to cerebrospinal fluid shunt devices:a review of cellular pathology.Neurosurgery,1998,42(2):319-326.
  • 5Arnell K,Olsen L.Distal catheter obstruction from non-infention 2 cause in ventriculo peritoneal shunted children.J Pediatr surg,2004.14(4):245-349.
  • 6Browd SR,Ragel BT,Gottfried ON,et al.Failure of cerebrospinal fluid shunts part Ⅰ:obstruction and mechanical failure.Pediatric Neurosurgery,2006,34(2):83 -92.
  • 7Rayport M,Resiss J.Hydrodynamic properties of certain shunt assemblies for the treatment of hydrocephalus.J Neurosurg,1969,30(4):455-467.
  • 8Brydon HL,Huyward R,Harkness W.Physical properties of cerebrospinal fluid of relevance to shunt function 1:the effect of protein up on CSF viscosity.J Neurosurg,1995,9 (5):639-644.
  • 9Baird C,Farner S,Mohr C,et al.The Effects of Protein,Red Blood Cells and Whole Blood on PS Valve Function.Pediatric Neurosurg,2002,37(4):186-193.
  • 10Schuhmann MU,Ostrowski KR,Draper EJ,et al.The value of C-reactive protein in the management of shunt Infections.J Neurosurg (Pediatrics3)2005,103(3 Suppl):223 -230.

共引文献45

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部