期刊文献+

荧光原位杂交技术检测多发性骨髓瘤染色体异常 被引量:2

Detection of chromosomal aberrations in multiple myeloma with fluorescence in situ hybridization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨荧光原位杂交(FISH)技术检测多发性骨髓瘤患者染色体异常的临床价值。方法:运用FISH技术,采用5种特异性DNA探针检测20例多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者染色体异常,并与常规细胞遗传学分析结果比较。结果:FISH显示20例MM患者中18例出现染色体异常,总异常检出率为90%,其中14q32易位65%(13/20),del(13q14)阳性率为55%(11/20),1q21异常25%(5/20),p53阳性率15%(3/20)。常规染色体分析异常检出率仅为15%(3/20)。结论:del(13q14)和14q32易位是MM患者最常见的染色体异常。FISH比传统的染色体检查更敏感可靠,并可作为MM预后评估的一项指标。 Objective: To detect of chromosomal abnormalities in multiple myeloma (MM) patients with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Methods: FISH was performed in 20 MM patients using 5 specific DNA probes. The difference in chromosomal abnormalities was compared by FISH and other routine cytogenetic tests. Results- Eighteen of the 20 patients showed chromosomal abnormalities (90%). The positive rates oft(14q32), del(13q14), dup(lq21), and p53 gene were 65% (13 in 20), 55% (11 in 20), 25% (5 in 20), and 15%(3 in 20), respectively. The abnormal rate of the conventional chromosome examination was 15% only. Conclusion: FISH is more sensitive than traditional chromosomal tests and can be used as an index in prognostic evaluation for MM. Del(13q14) and t(14q32) are the most common chromosomal abnormalities in MM patients.
出处 《中南大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第10期983-989,共7页 Journal of Central South University :Medical Science
基金 卫生部科研课题(WKJ2007-3-001)~~
关键词 骨髓瘤 原位杂交技术 染色体畸变 myeloma in situ hybridization chromosomal aberration
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1张艳,江滨,黄晓军,师岩,何琦,党辉,邱镜滢,陆道培.多发性骨髓瘤的细胞遗传学研究[J].中国实验血液学杂志,2007,15(1):76-78. 被引量:20
  • 2Sawyer JR, Waldron JA, Jagannath S, et al. Cytogenetics findings in 200 patients with multiple myeloma[J]. Cancer Genet Cytogenet, 1995, 82(1): 41-49.
  • 3Schmidt-Wolf IG, Glasmacher A, Hahn-Ast C, et al. Chromosomal aberrations in 130 patients with multiple myeloma studied by interphase FISH: diagnostic and prognostic relevance [J]. Cancer Genet Cytogenet, 2006, 167(1): 20-25.
  • 4Walker BA, WardeU CP, Chiecchio L, et al. Aberrant global methylation patterns affect the molecular pathogenesis and prognosis of multiple myeloma[J]. Blood, 2011, 117(2): 553-562.
  • 5Calasanz MJ, Cigudosa JC, Odero MD, et al. Cytogenetic analysis of 280 patients with multiple myeloma and related disorders: primary breakpoints and clinical correlations [J]. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 1997, 18(2): 84-93.
  • 6Pinkel D, Straume T, GrayJW.. Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high-sensitivity3 fluorescence hybridization [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1986, 83 (9): 2934-2938.
  • 7Harrison CJ, Mazzullo H, Cheung KL, et al. Cytogenetics of multiple myeloma: interpretation of fluorescence in situ hybridization results[J]. BrJ Haematol, 2003, 120(6): 944-952.
  • 8Steward AK, Fonseca R. Review of molecular diagnostics in multiple myeloma [J]. Expert Rev Mol Diagn, 2007, 7(4): 453-459.
  • 9Terpos E, Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou Vj Dimopoulos MA. Clinical implications of chromosomal abnormalities in muhiple myeloma [J]. Leuk Lymphoma, 2006, 47(5): 803-814.
  • 10Avet-Loiseau H, Attal M, Moreau P, et al. Genetic abnormalities and survival in multiple myeloma: the experience of the Intergroupe Francophone du Myeloma [J]. Blood, 2007, 109(8): 3489-3495.

二级参考文献8

  • 1Debes-Marum CS, Dewald GW, Bryant S, et al. Chromosome abnormalities clustering and its implications for pathogenesis and prognosis in myeloma. Leukemia, 2003 ; 17:427 - 436
  • 2Lai JL, Zandecki M, Mary JY, et al. Improved cytogenetics in multiple myeloma:a study of 151 patients including 117 patients at diagnosis. Blood, 1995 ; 85:2490 - 2497
  • 3Harrison C J, Mazzullo H, Cheung KL, et al. Cytogenetics of multiple myeloma:interpretation of fluorescence in situ hybridization resuits. Br J Haematol, 2003; 120:944 -952
  • 4Avet-Loiseau H, Facon T, Grosbois B, et al. Oncogenesis of multiple myeloma: 14q32 and 13q chromosomal abnormalities are not randomly distributed, but correlate with natural history, immunological features, and clinical presentation. Blood, 2002; 99:2185-2191
  • 5Zojer N, Konigskerg R, Ackermann J, etal. Deletion of 13q14 remains an independent adverse prognostic variable in multiple myeloma despite its frequent detection by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. Blood, 2000; 95: 1925- 1930
  • 6Pantou D, Rizou H, Tsarouha H, et al. Cytogenetic manifestations of multiple myeloma heterogeneity. Genes-Chromosomes-Cancer,2005 ; 42 : 44 - 57
  • 7佟刚,魏素芳.多发性骨髓瘤的细胞遗传学研究进展[J].国外医学(输血及血液学分册),1990,13(3):137-139. 被引量:3
  • 8丘镜滢,党辉,任汉云,王德炳,段爱君.自体血浆培养体系对改善白血病骨髓细胞染色体的研究[J].北京医科大学学报,1993,25(4):249-251. 被引量:46

共引文献19

同被引文献24

  • 1Brian A. Walker,Christopher P. Wardell,Laura Chiecchio,Emma M. Smith,Kevin D. Boyd,Antonino Neri,Faith E. Davies,Fiona M. Ross,Gareth J. Morg.Aberrant global methylation patterns affect the molecular pathogenesis and prognosis of multiple myeloma. Blood . 2011
  • 2Malcovati L, Nimer SD. Myelodysplastic syndromes: diagnosis and staging[J]. Cancer Control,2008,15(4 Supplement) :4.
  • 3H aase D,Germing U, Schanz J, et al. New insights into the prog- nostic impact of the karyotype in MDS and correlation with sub- types~evidence from a core dataset of 2124 patients[J]. Blood, 2007,110(13) :4385.
  • 4Coleman J F, Theil K S, Tubbs R R, et al. Diagnostic Yield of Bone Marrow and Peripheral Blood FISH Panel Testing in Clini- cally Suspected Myelodysplastic Syndromes and/or Acute Mye- loid Leukemia A Prospective Analysis of 433 Cases[J]. Am J Clin Pathol,2011,135(6) :915.
  • 5Beyer V, Castagn6 C, Mtihlematter D, et al. Systematic screening at diagnosis of -5/del(5) ( q31 ),-7, or chromosome 8 aneuploidy by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in 110 acute my- elocytic leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome pa- tients:concordances and discrepancies with conventional cytoge- netics[J]. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2004,152 (1) : 29.
  • 6Skonieczka K,Duszefiko E, Wyrowifiska E, et al. Usefulness of classic cytogenetic testing compared to fluorescence in situ hy- bridization in genetic diagnosis of 58 patients with myelodysplas- tic syndromes[J]. Pol Arch Med Wewn, 2009,119 (6): 366.
  • 7Yang W,Stotler B,Sevilla D W,et al. FISH analysis in addition to G-band karyotyping & utility in evaluation of myelodysplastic syn- dromes? [J]. Leuk Res,2010,34(4) :420.
  • 8Giagounidis A A N, Aul C. The 5q- syndrome[J]. Cancer Treat Res, 2008,142 : 133.
  • 9Mohamedali A,Mufti G J. Van - den Berghe's 5q - syndrome in 2008[J]. Br J Haematol, 2009,144 (2) : 157.
  • 10Fuchs O. Important genes in the pathogenesis of 5q-syndrome and their connection with ribosomal stress and the innate immune system pathway[J]. Leuk Res Treatment,2012,179402.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部