期刊文献+

基于概念辨析的类比推理研究的新视角 被引量:3

New Perspective of Analogical Reasoning Research Based on Concept Discrimination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 该研究从概念的辨析上着手,不仅可以在相似的多个概念上理清各自的异同,更重要的是分析得出,作为科学发现和创造性思维的核心———类比推理(狭义类比推理),它有着不同于一般思维活动中的类比推理(广义类比推理)的特点。在此基础之上,才能更好地揭示其发生的规律,以利于更进一步的实证研究。 In this study, differentiation and analysis of the concepts not only clarified the similarities and differences between the multi- pie similar concepts, but more importantly, the analysis obtained that the core of the creative thinking - analogical reasoning have the characteristics that is different from the characteristics of analogical reasoning in general thinking activities. On this basis, it can reveal the regularity of analogical reasoning occurrence better,and conducive to further empirical research.
作者 邱琴 胡竹菁
出处 《心理学探新》 CSSCI 2012年第4期323-328,共6页 Psychological Exploration
基金 江西省社会科学“十一五”规划项目(10JY71) 江西师范大学博士启动基金项目,江西师范大学2012年度校级教学改革课题
关键词 广义类比推理 狭义类比推理 类比变换 概念辨析 seneralized analogical reasoning narrow sense analogical reasoning analogical transformation concept discrimination
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献28

  • 1皮连生.《智育心理学》,人民教育出版社1996年4月版.
  • 2Thomdike, E.L. ( 1903). Educational psychology, New York : Lemcke & buechner.
  • 3Judd, C. H. ( 1980). The relation of special training to general intelligence. Educational Review, 36,28 - 42.
  • 4Wertheimer, M. ( 1945 ). Productive thinking. New York : Harper & Brothers.
  • 5Harlow. H. F. ( 1949). The formation of learning set. Psychologlcal Review, 56.
  • 6Royer, J.M. ( 1979). Theories of the transfer of learning.Educational Psychologist. 14
  • 7Ausbel, D.P. et al. ( 1978). Educational psychology: A cognitive view(2nd).
  • 8Chi. M.T.H., Glaser, R. & Reese. ( 1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. Stemverg( Ed), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence ( pp7 - 75). Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
  • 9Simon, D. P. & Simon, H.A. (1978) Individual deftercnces in solving physics problems. In R. S. Sicglcr( Ed). Children's thinking: What develops? (pp325 - 348). Hillsdale, HI: Erlbaum.
  • 10Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K.J. (1983) Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15,1 - 38.

共引文献42

同被引文献27

  • 1周少华.“类推”与刑法之“禁止类推”原则——一个方法论上的阐释[J].法学研究,2004,26(5):58-70. 被引量:35
  • 2焦宝乾.法的发现与证立[J].法学研究,2005,27(5):149-160. 被引量:54
  • 3杜宇.刑法上之“类推禁止”如何可能? 一个方法论上的悬疑[J].中外法学,2006,18(4):407-425. 被引量:45
  • 4Clement, C. A., & Gentner, D. (1991) . Systematicity as a selection constraint in analogical mapping. Cognitive Science, 15, 89-132.
  • 5Gentner, D., & Toupin, C. (1986) . Systematicity and surface simi- larity in the development of analogy. Cognitive Science, 10, 277-300.
  • 6Gentner, D. (2003) . Why we're so smart. In: D. Gentner, S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.) , Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 195-235.
  • 7Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995) . Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • 8Goswami, U. (1996) . Analogical reasoning and cognitive develop- ment. In: H. Reese (Ed.) , Advances in child development and behavior. CA: Academic Press, 92-135.
  • 9Goswami, U. (2001) . Analogical reasoning in children. In: D. Gen-trier, K. J. Holyoak, B. N. Kokinov (Eds.) , The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 437-470.
  • 10Halford, G. S. (1993) . Children's Understanding: The development of mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部