期刊文献+

基于下游河道水流情势天然性要求的水库优化调度 被引量:5

Downstream natural flow regime-based optimal operation of reservoir
原文传递
导出
摘要 去贴近能够满足所有物种要求的河流天然水文情势的方法比起只重视少量物种生存条件的方法更优。RVA方法基于32个水流指标全面描述了河流的水流情势,并量化出受人类影响后的水文情势的水文变化测度。本文首先基于RVA方法建立了考虑水流情势天然性要求的河流生态目标,并根据目标集对河流环境的隶属性,采用模糊学理论确定出目标集的隶属函数,作为优化目标。再将该方法用于丹江口水库,建立基于其下游襄阳断面河道水流情势要求的生态调度模型,并进行优化求解,得出最优出流过程对襄阳断面的环境友好度为0.5。最后建立以发电量最大为目标的传统调度模型,对比分析了环境友好度和发电效益指标,结果表明基于水流情势要求的水库调度在改善河流生态环境方面具有明显的优势,但也损失了部分的发电效益。通过对比分析也认为通过一定的调度手段,可以实现生态与发电效益的双赢。 Rather than optimizing water regimes for one or a few species, a better approach is to approximate the natural flow regime that maintains the entire panoply of species. RVA method generally describes flow regimes with 32 hydrologic indicators, and quantifies passing-dam changes in these indicators. Based on this observation, an ecological goal is established to consider natural river flow regimes in this paper. By the membership of river environment in the goal set, the membership function or the optimization goal is determined by using fuzziology. This model is applied to the Xiangyang cross section downstream the Danjiangkou reservoir, maximizing the membership of indicators for maintaining the natural flow regime. Calculations show that the maximum membership is 0.5 or that the optimum release after regulation is 50% degree close to the natural flow regime. Then a traditional regulation model of power generation is developed to analyze environment sound degree and power generation. The results indicate that the ecological model is better in improving river ecosystem, but it reduces power generation to some extent. And a win-win between ecosystem and power generation is also possible by optimizing regulation.
出处 《水力发电学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期84-89,共6页 Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(50779049)
关键词 水利工程管理 水库调度 河流生态目标 RVA方法 水流情势 丹江口水库 hydraulic engineering menagement reservoir operation river ecological objective RVA flowregime Danjiangkou reservoir
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Gorman G T, and J R Karr. Habitat structure and stream fish communities [ J]. Ecology, 1978, 59:507-515.
  • 2Poff N L, J V Ward. Implications of streamflow variability and predictability for lotic community structure: a regional analysis of streamflow patterns [ J]. Canadian Journal of Aquatic Sciences, 1989,46 : 1805-1818.
  • 3Sparks R E. Risks of altering the h3/drologic regime of large rivers [ J ]. Princeton Scientific Publishing, 1992,20:119-152.
  • 4Poff N L, Allan J D, Bain M B, Karr J R, Prestegard B D, Richter B D, Sparks R E,and Stromberg J C. The natural flow regime : a paradigm for river conservation and restoration [ J]. Bioscience, 1997,47( 11 ) :22-29.
  • 5Richter B D, Baumgartner J V, POWELL J, el al. A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems [ J]. Conservation Biology, 1996, 10(4):1163-11747.
  • 6Richter B D, Baumgartner J V, Wigington R, Braun D P. How much water does a river need? [J. Freshwater Biology, 1997,37: 231-249.
  • 7杨娜,梅亚东,尹志伟.建坝对下游河道水文情势影响RVA评价方法的改进[J].长江流域资源与环境,2010,19(5):560-565. 被引量:23
  • 8Shiau, Jenq Tzong, Fu ChunWu. Compromise programming methodology for determining insteramflow under muhiobjective water allocation criteria[ J ]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association. 2006, 42 (5) : 1179-1191.
  • 9Jian-ping Suen,J Wayland Eheart. Reservoir management to balance ecosystem and human needs: incorporating the paradigm of the ecological flow regime [ J ]. Water Resources Research,2006, 42, W03417.
  • 10梅亚东,杨娜,翟丽妮.雅砻江下游梯级水库生态友好型优化调度[J].水科学进展,2009,20(5):721-725. 被引量:39

二级参考文献18

  • 1陈敏建,丰华丽,王立群,王高旭,黄昌硕.生态标准河流和调度管理研究[J].水科学进展,2006,17(5):631-636. 被引量:45
  • 2王玉蓉,李嘉,李克锋,芮建良.雅砻江锦屏二级水电站减水河段生态需水量研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2007,16(1):81-85. 被引量:18
  • 3王玉蓉,李嘉,李克锋,芮建良.水电站减水河段鱼类生境需求的水力参数[J].水利学报,2007,38(1):107-111. 被引量:32
  • 4董哲仁,孙东亚,赵进勇.水库多目标生态调度[J].水利水电技术,2007,38(1):28-32. 被引量:118
  • 5SUEN J P, EHEART J W. Reservoir management to balance ecosystem and human needs: Incorporating the paradigm of the ecological flow regime[J]. Water Resources Research, 2006, 42(3): 1-9.
  • 6SHIAU J T, WU F C. Compromise programming methodology for determining instream flow under multiobjective water allocation criteria[J]. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2006, 42 (5): 1179-1191.
  • 7POFF N L, ALLEN J D, BAIN M B, et al. The natural flow regime: A paradign for river conservation and restoration[J]. Bioscience, 1997, 47: 769-784.
  • 8Chjeng-Lun Shieh,Yuh-Rong Guh,Shi-Qin Wang.The application of range of variability approach to the assessment of a check dam on riverine habitat alteration[J]. Environmental Geology . 2007 (3)
  • 9SHI AU J T,WU F C.Assessment of hydrologic alterationscaused by CHI-CHI diversion weir in Chou-Shui Creek TAI-Wan:opportunities for Restoring natural flow conditions. River research and application . 2004
  • 10SHIEH C L,GUH Y R,WANG S Q.The application of rangeof variability approachtothe assessment of a check damon riv-erine habitat alteration. Environmental Geology . 2007

共引文献60

同被引文献80

引证文献5

二级引证文献85

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部