摘要
目的:分析青年视屏终端工作者干眼症的患病因素,探讨人工泪液治疗干眼症的疗效。方法:对136例长期视屏终端接触的青年干眼症患者进行临床调查,包括常见症状(眼干、视疲劳、异物感等),泪膜破裂时间(BUT)、SⅠt试验。共发放136份问卷,有效问卷130份,有效率95.6%。将130例随机分组,治疗组65例应用人工泪液(泪然),3次/d,1滴/次。对照组65例口服四环素,2次/d,250mg/次,连续服用3mo。结果:常见症状依次是:眼干燥异物感(治疗组89.2%、对照组80.0%)、灼热感(治疗组33.9%、对照组30.8%)、视疲劳(治疗组72.3%、对照组67.7%)、视物模糊(治疗组30.8%、对照组35.4%)、眼痛(治疗组24.6%、对照组21.5%);两组无显著性差异。治疗前后两组BUT、SⅠt试验存在明显统计学差异。结论:视屏终端综合征(video display terminals,VDT)是引起青年干眼症的主要原因,局部使用人工泪液组明显优于口服四环素组。
AIM:To analyze the prevalence factors of dry eye syndrome in youth video terminals workers,and to explore the efficacy of artificial tear for the treatment of dry eye syndrome.METHODS:Totally 136 cases with dry eye syndrome due to long-term video terminal contacts were clinically investigated,including common symptoms(dry eye,visual fatigue,foreign body sensation etc.),breaking-up time(BUT),Schirmer test.Then 130 cases were selected and randomly divided into two groups.Treatment group 65 cases were treated by artificial tears,3 times a day,one drop each time.Control group 65 cases were treated with oral tetracycline 250mg,twice a day,continuous for 3 months.RESULTS::Common symptoms:dry eye and foreign body sensation(89.2% in the treatment group,control group 80.0%),burning sensation(33.9% in the treatment group,control group 30.8%),asthenopia(treatment group 72.3%,control group 67.7%),blurred vision(30.8% in the treatment group,control group 35.4%),eye pain(therapy group,24.6% control group 21.5%);the two groups had no significant difference.Before and after the treatment,the two experiments of BUT and Schirmer had significantly statistical difference.CONCLUSION:Video display terminals(VDT)is the main reason for youth dry eye syndrome.Local artificial tears using is significantly better than oral tetracycline.
出处
《国际眼科杂志》
CAS
2012年第11期2167-2169,共3页
International Eye Science
关键词
干眼症
视屏终端
泪膜破裂时间
人工泪液
dry eye syndrome
video terminal
breaking-up time
artificial tears