摘要
在国外,民事诉讼要件理论有相对完整的理论构架,然而我国学者则研究甚少,甚至是还处在概念不清的混乱阶段。阐释清楚民事诉讼要件的概念和其研究价值至关重要。考察大陆法系代表国家德国、日本和英美法系代表国家美国的诉讼要件理论大有裨益,因此通过比较法的研究,希望能够对我国民事诉讼要件理论的构建以及相关制度的修改和完善有所启示。
In foreign countries,the theory of civil litigation requirements have relatively integral theory frame,however,scholars in our country have very little research,or even what the concept is still at the stage of chaos.Clarifying the concept of civil litigation requirements and its research value are very important.The study of the continental law system in Germany,Japan and common law system in America is very helpful.Through the comparison of the research,we hope the theory of civil litigation requirements of our county can be constructed,and have the enlightenment of relevant systems to modify and improve.
出处
《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》
2012年第3期114-117,共4页
Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
关键词
民事诉讼
诉讼要件
构成
审查
civil litigation
constitutive requirements
constitution
investigation