期刊文献+

证券监管视野下的《证券法》完善之反思

Reflection of Improving the Securities Law under the Regulatory Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 一个强大的证券市场取决于一个复杂的法律和制度网络,市场机制、中介组织、市场自律监管机构、法庭执法、监管者执法是保障证券市场高效运行的五条防线,市场机制、中介组织、市场自律监管机构是证券监管的微观基础,而作为私人执法机构的法庭与作为公共执法机构的监管者,对证券市场的发展起着极为重要的作用,而监管的最终目的是促进私人缔约。我国证券监管体制基本建立,但是存在监管执法力度不足,证券市场微观基础薄弱,《证券法》无法适应高速发展的市场需要等问题。《证券法》应该关注证券市场基础制度问题,而把具体操作性问题交给监管者或证券自律监管机构,并把监管者的立法作为《证券法》修订前的试错机制。 A strong stock market depends on a complex legal system. Market mechanism, intermediary or- ganizations, the market self-regulatory institutions, enforcement of the court and enforcement by regulators are five important factors to protect the efficient running of securities market. Market mechanism, intermediary or- ganizations, and the market self-regulatory institutions is the micro-foundation for securities market regulation. The court, as the private law enforcement agency, and the regulator, as the public law enforcement agency, are significant to the securities market. And the ultimate goal of regulations is to promote private contracting. In China, the securities market regulatory system has been basically established. But regulatory enforcement is not as good as we expect. The securities law can meet the securities market needs. The securities law should pay at- tention to the fundamental system of the securities market and leave the specific operations to the operators and the intermediaries. The legislations of the operator should better be the experiment of the securities law amend- ment.
作者 李泽东
出处 《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》 2012年第4期84-87,共4页 Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law
关键词 证券监管 监管方式 证券法 Securities regulation Regulatory approaches Securities Law
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1张新;朱武祥.证券监管的经济学分析[M]上海:上海三联书店,2008113.
  • 2张慧莲.证券监管的经济学分析[M]北京:中国金融出版社,200561.
  • 3爱德华.格莱泽,西蒙.约翰逊,安德烈.施莱弗,班颖杰.科斯对科斯定理——波兰与捷克证券市场规制的比较[J].经济社会体制比较,2001(2):1-12. 被引量:23
  • 4拉古拉迈·拉詹;路易吉·津加莱斯;余江.从资本家手中拯救资本主义[M]北京:中信出版社,2004107.
  • 5Coffee,John C.JR. Law and the Market:the Impact of Enforcement[J].University of Pennsylvania Law Review,2007,(02):229-311.
  • 6卡塔琳娜?皮斯托;许成钢.不完备法律--种概念性分析框架及其在金融市场监管发展中的应用[J]比较,2009(27).
  • 7弗.伊斯特布鲁克,丹.费雪,雨廷.美国证券市场的强制披露与投资者保护[J].经济社会体制比较,2004(4):17-27. 被引量:8
  • 8弗兰克.伊斯特布鲁克,丹尼尔.费雪,袁增霆.美国证券市场的强制披露与投资者保护(续)[J].经济社会体制比较,2004(5):80-91. 被引量:3
  • 9李波.公共执法与私人执法的比较经济研究[M]北京:北京大学出版社,2008.
  • 10龙超.证券市场监管的经济学分析[M]北京:经济科学出版社,200337.

二级参考文献3

共引文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部