论“醉驾不必一律入罪”

On the Subject “Drunk Driving Shall not Constitute a Crime”

针对醉酒驾驶行为是否一律入罪,学界形成了"一律论"与"不必论"两种观点的对立。"一律论"实质上是形式解释论的观点,而"不必论"则是实质解释论的结论,故"一律论"与"不必论"的对立本质上是形式解释论与实质解释论的对立。醉酒驾驶是抽象危险犯而不是情节犯,抽象危险犯存在处罚范围过大的弊病,故而应当对其进行限制。《刑法》第13条"但书"规定是对犯罪构成进行实质解释的法律依据,而实质解释是限制诸如醉驾等抽象危险犯处罚范围的最佳方式。

For drunk driving behavior will all be convicted,the academia formed ＂all is crime＂ and the opposing point of view.＂All is crime＂ is essentially a form interpretation theory point of view,and the opposing point of view theory is the substantive interpretation conclusion,so ＂all is crimme＂ and ＂not all is crime＂ on the contrary is essentially a form of interpretation theory and the substantial interpretation theory of opposites.Drunk driving is Abstract dangerous criminal rather than plot crimes,Abstract dangerous criminal penalties range exists the problem of too much therefore should carry on the limit.Article thirteenth of the criminal law on the crime of proviso is substantially explain the legal basis,and the substantial interpretation is in the best way to limit as drunk driving and other Abstract dangerous criminal punishment scope.