期刊文献+

10个切花菊品种耐旱性评价及耐旱生理机制探讨

Evaluation of drought tolerance and corresponding exploration of the physiological mechanism of ten cut Chrysanthemum
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过幼苗期自然失水胁迫划分萎蔫指数,并对10个切花菊品种苗期耐旱性进行评价以及对典型耐旱和不耐旱品种叶片失水速率、根冠比、电导率、丙二醛含量、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)活性等形态和生理指标进行测定分析,探讨其耐旱生理机制。结果表明:在供试的10个品种中最耐旱的是南京红雀,最不耐旱的是南农粉樱;耐旱品种叶片失水速率较慢、根冠比较大,干旱胁迫使叶片电导率、丙二醛含量、SOD活性均上升,耐旱品种与非耐旱品种各项指标变化率有显著差异。叶片失水速率、根冠比、电导率、丙二醛含量、SOD活性可以作为切花菊耐旱性评价的指标。 The drought tolerance of ten cultivars of cut chrysanthemum was evaluated in this study through wilting index (WI) divided by means of natural water loss stress at their seedling stage. The morphological and physiological indicators, such as the water loss rate of leaves, the root-shoot ratio, the electric conductivity, MDA content and the activity of SOD, were measured in order to explore the physiological mechanism of drought tolerance. The results indicated that the most drought-tolerant cuttivar Nanjing Hongque displayed lower water loss rate of leaves and higher root- shoot ratio. The electric conductivity in leaves, the MDA content and the activity of SOD increased under the drought stress. Among cultivars evaluated, Nannong Fenying had the least drought tolerance. There were significant differences in each indicator between the drought-tolerant and the non-tolerant cultivars. Therefore, the water loss rate of leaves, the root-shoot ratio, the electric conductivity, the MDA content and the activity of SOD can be used as the indicators of evaluation of drought tolerance in Cut Chrysanthemum.
出处 《扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期81-85,共5页 Journal of Yangzhou University:Agricultural and Life Science Edition
基金 国家农业科技成果转化项目(2010GB2360063) 中央高校基本科研业务费项目(KYZ201112 Y0201100252) 江苏省科技支撑计划项目(BE2011325) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(NCET-10-0492)
关键词 切花菊 耐旱性 生理指标 评价 cut chrysanthemum drought tolerancel physiological indices evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献26

  • 1Abraham E M, Huang B R, Bonos S A, et al. Evaluation of drought resistance for Texas Bluegrass,Kentucky Bluegrass, and their hybrids [J]. Crop Science, 2004, 44: 1746-1753.
  • 2Maiti R K, Singh V P, Arreola E S, et al. Physiological, biochemical and molecular mechanisms of resistance of Phaseolus bean and other related crops to drought, high and low temperature and salinity [J]. Review Crop Research, 2002, 24(2): 205- 241.
  • 3张雪妍,刘传亮,王俊娟,李付广,叶武威.PEG胁迫方法评价棉花幼苗耐旱性研究[J].棉花学报,2007,19(3):205-209. 被引量:41
  • 4武斌,李新海,肖木辑,谢传晓,郝转芳,李明顺,张世煌.53份玉米自交系的苗期耐旱性分析[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(4):665-676. 被引量:75
  • 5Islam M S, Srivastava P S L, Deshmukh P S. Evaluation of screening techniques for drought tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ) [J]. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology, 1998, 3(3): 197-200.
  • 6Grzesiak S, Grzesiak M T, Filek W, et al. Evaluation of physiological screening tests for breeding drought resistant triticale (Triticosecale wittmack) [J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2003, 25(1) : 29-37.
  • 7刘卓,王志锋,耿慧,于洪柱,徐安凯.15个紫花苜蓿品种抗旱性评价[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(35):17442-17444. 被引量:10
  • 8孙彦,杨青川,张英华.不同草坪草种及品种苗期抗旱性比较[J].草地学报,2001,9(1):16-20. 被引量:77
  • 9张常青,洪波,李建科,高俊平.地被菊花幼苗耐旱性评价方法研究[J].中国农业科学,2005,38(4):789-796. 被引量:50
  • 10Kumar A, Singh D P. Use of physiological indices as a screening technique for drought tolerance in oilseed brassica species [J]. Annals of Botany, 1998, 81: 413-420.

二级参考文献155

共引文献404

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部