期刊文献+

美国国家构建进程中的共识与分歧——对1787年宪法制定和批准过程的分析 被引量:1

The Agreements and Disagreements in US State Building——An Analysis of the Formulation and Ratification Procedure of the1787 U.S. Constitution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国的国家构建,起因是邦联政府的治理危机,内容是联邦宪法的制定和批准,成果是延续至今的美国宪政体制。本文从国家构建理论出发,围绕政府权力的来源与归宿、分割与制衡,对1787年宪法制定和批准阶段各方的分歧及其背后的共识予以分析。在宪法制定阶段,制宪代表面对共同的治理危机,通过闭门会议,就宪法的设计展开谈判,达成妥协,凸现了各派力量的利益冲突;在宪法批准阶段,联邦主义者和反联邦主义者基于共享的政治理念,通过公开辩论,就宪法的总体精神和具体条款陈述双方见解,突显的是各派意见的理念分歧。这些分歧不是美国国家构建的基石,那些共同面对的挑战,相互依赖的利益,共享的记忆与理念才是十三州合众为一的根源。因此,在总结美国政治发展的历史经验时,应该认识到国家构建的重点和难点,以及共识与分歧的必然性和可变性。 The U.S.state building process was set in motion by the governance crisis of the federal government.It evolved around the formulation and ratification of the federal constitution,with the American constitutional system being its fruit,which lasts to this day.By employing the theory of state construction,the origin and purpose of government power and its checks and balances,the author tried to analyze the disagreements in formulating and ratifying the 1787 U.S.Constitution and the agreements behind the disagreements.Jointly faced with the governance crisis at the stage of formulating the constitution,members of the constitutional assembly launched negotiations and reached comprises behind doors,which highlighted the conflicts of interests of different parties.At the stage of ratifying the constitution,federalists and anti-federalists,based on their shared political ideas,explained their views on the general spirit of the constitution and specific provisions via debates in public,which displayed the theoretical divergence of different parties.These divergences,however,were not the corner stone for building America.What truly bond the 13 states in one were the challenges they both faced,the interests they jointly relied and the memories and ideas they all shared.Therefore,while we looking back and drawing lessons from the progress of American politics,it's necessary to recognize that the key and difficult factors of state building,as well as the inevitability and variability of agreements and disagreements.
作者 孙世鳌
出处 《甘肃行政学院学报》 2012年第5期46-57,126-127,共12页 Journal of Gansu Administration Institute
基金 国家社会科学基金(项目批准号:06AZZ004) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地基金(批准号:06JJD810160)资助
关键词 1787年宪法 国家构建 宪政体制 共识 分歧 联邦主义者 反联邦主义者 1787 U.S.Constitution State building Constitutonal system Agreements Disagreements Federalists Anti-Federalists
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1马骏.改革共识:改良而不是革命[J].中国改革,2008(10):29-31. 被引量:4
  • 2徐湘林.转型危机与国家治理:中国的经验[J].经济社会体制比较,2010(5):1-14. 被引量:168
  • 3Murray Dry, "Introduction," in Hebert J. Storing ed., The Anti-Federalist: Writings by the Opponents of the Constitution, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1985.
  • 4James H. Hutson, "Country, Court, and Constitution: Antifederalism and the Historians," The William and Mary Quarterly, 3rd Set., vol. 38, no. 3, 1981.
  • 5查尔斯·比尔德.美国宪法的经济观[M].何希齐译.北京:商务印书馆,1984.
  • 6Jackson Turner Main, The Antitederalists: Critics of the Constitution, 1781-1788, New York: W.W. Norton &company, 1974.
  • 7Robert Allen Rutland, The Ordeal of the Constitution: The Antifederalists and the Ratification Struggle of 1787-1788, Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1983.
  • 8李剑鸣.伯纳德·贝林的史学初论[J].史学理论研究,1999(1):130-138. 被引量:15
  • 9Bernard Bailyn, The Ideological Origins d the American Revolution, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1992.
  • 10Gordon S. Wood, The Creation of the Mnerican Republic, 1776- 1787.

二级参考文献340

  • 1亚当.普热沃斯基,晓健.制度起作用吗?[J].经济社会体制比较,2005(3):97-102. 被引量:17
  • 2李剑鸣.美国革命时期民主概念的演变[J].历史研究,2007(1):130-157. 被引量:26
  • 3托克维尔.论美国的民主[M].商务印书馆,1988..
  • 4孟德斯鸠.《论法的精神》上册.张雁深译.北京:商务印书馆,1995年,第15、17页.
  • 5[美]弗朗西斯·福山.《国家构建:21世纪的国家治理与世界秩序》,北京:中国社会科学出版社,2007年.
  • 6Robert Livingston, Speech in New York ratifying convention, June 19, 1788, in Elliot, ed., The Debates of the Several State Conventions, vol.Ⅱ, pp. 209-210.
  • 7Samuel Adams to John Adams, 20 Nov., 1790, in Adams, ed., The Works of John Adams, vol. Ⅵ, p. 421.
  • 8Wise, A Vindication of the Government of New-England Churches, p. 61.
  • 9Elisha Williams, "The Essential Rights and Liberties of Protestants, " in Morgan, ed. , Puritan Political Ideas, p. 272.
  • 10William Paca to the Citizen, February 15, 1787, in Yazawa, ed., Representative Government and the Revolution, p. 61.

同被引文献25

  • 1林尚立.领导与执政:党、国家与社会关系转型的政治学分析[J].毛泽东邓小平理论研究,2001(6):37-44. 被引量:133
  • 2景跃进.党、国家与社会:三者维度的关系——从基层实践看中国政治的特点[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2005,44(2):9-13. 被引量:93
  • 3徐湘林.以政治稳定为基础的中国渐进政治改革[J].战略与管理,2000,(5).
  • 4曾峻.用“顶层设计”来深化改革[N].学习时报,2011-10-15.
  • 5陈家刚.政治体制改革需要“顶层设计”[N].学习时报,2012-04-30(5).
  • 6夏斌.深入研究和推进改革顶层设计[N].人民日报,2012-06-25(07).
  • 7刘鹤.关于改革的总体规划、顶层设计和重点内容[N].中国经济时报,2011-05-20(05).
  • 8马连鹏.改革尚未有共识警惕“城堡政治”--专访郑永年[N].中国经营报,2012-04-02(B16).
  • 9辛鸣.顶层设计绝非“改革计划书”[J].人民论坛,2012,(3):17-19.
  • 10杨雪冬.顶层设计与社会自主[N].南方日报,2012-04-10(F02).

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部