期刊文献+

基于Kriging模型的武器装备体系效能分析 被引量:1

Effectiveness Analysis of Weapon System-of-systems Based on Kriging Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了分析影响装备体系作战效能的各个输入因素的变化对作战效能的影响,采用一种基于方差的敏感性分析方法——Sobol指数法,对体系模型的数据进行分析;采用基于Kriging模型的方法对Sobol指数进行计算。最后运用该方法对一防空装备体系数据进行分析,确定了影响作战效能的关键因素,为进一步的体系效能优化提供了依据。 To determine how and how much each variable affect the effectiveness of SoS,a variance-based method,Sobol indices method was used to analyze the data of SoS model.Using a method based on Kriging model,improvement was made in the calculation of Sobol indices.At last,using this method,an air defense weapon system was analyzed,and its key inputs were found.And these results give support to the optimization of the effectiveness of the SoS.
机构地区 解放军
出处 《舰船电子工程》 2012年第10期31-33,37,共4页 Ship Electronic Engineering
关键词 体系 效能分析 Sobol指数法 KRIGING模型 system-of-systems effectiveness analysis Sobol indices method Kriging model
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Sobol IM. Sensitivity Estimates for nonlinear mathematical models[J]. Math Model Comput Exp, 1993,,407-414.
  • 2罗鹏程,傅攀峰.武器装备敏感性分析方法综述[J].计算机工程与设计,2008,29(21):5546-5549. 被引量:15
  • 3蔡毅,邢岩,胡丹.敏感性分析综述[J].北京师范大学学报(自然科学版),2008,44(1):9-16. 被引量:198
  • 4Homma T, Saltelli A., Importance measures in global sensitivi-ty analysis of no:nline-ar models[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1996, (52) : 1-17.
  • 5Matherton. Principles of geo-statistics[J]. Economic Geology, 1963(58) : 1246-11266,.
  • 6Jones DR, Schonlau M, Welch WJ. Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions[J]. Journal of Global optimi- zation, 1998(13) :445-492.
  • 7Lophaven SN, Nielsen HB, Sondergaard J. DACE-A Matlab Kriging Toolbox, Informaties and mathematical modelling, Den- mark,2002.
  • 8谢延敏,于沪平,陈军,阮雪榆.基于Kriging模型的可靠度计算[J].上海交通大学学报,2007,41(2):177-180. 被引量:41

二级参考文献56

  • 1陈太聪,韩大建,苏成.参数灵敏度分析的神经网络方法及其工程应用[J].计算力学学报,2004,21(6):752-756. 被引量:26
  • 2万文,曹平,吴永恒.弹塑性极限平衡法分析复杂岩质边坡的稳定性[J].中国安全科学学报,2004,14(6):100-104. 被引量:72
  • 3杜德文,马淑珍,陈永良.地质统计学方法综述[J].世界地质,1995,14(4):79-84. 被引量:23
  • 4杨秀芝,贾春梅.投资项目因素敏感性分析[J].边疆经济与文化,2005(12):35-37. 被引量:4
  • 5Ascough II H C, Green T R, Ma L, et al. Key criteria and selection of sensitivity analysis methods applied to natural resource models [C]. Melbourne, Australia: Modsim International Congress on Modeling and Simulation, Modeling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, 2005:2463-2469.
  • 6Lu Y, Mohanty S.Sensitivity analysis of a complex proposed geologic waste disposal system using the Fourier amplitude sensitivity test method [J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2001(72):275-291.
  • 7Saltelli A, Ratto M, Tarantola S, et al.Sensitivity analysis practices: Strategies for model-based inference [J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety,2006,91 (10/11): 1109-1125.
  • 8Frey H C, Patil S R. Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods[OL], www.ce.ncsu.edu/risk/pdf/frey.pdf.
  • 9Saltelli A,Tarantola S,Chan K.A quantitative, model independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output[J]. Technometrics, 1999,41 (1):39-56.
  • 10Soban D S,Mavris D N.Use ofprobabilistic of campaign analysis [C].Seattle:World Aviation Congress,2001.

共引文献248

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部