期刊文献+

解读印度贵霜早期国王和年代的重要实物依据——腊跋闼柯贵霜碑铭述考 被引量:1

Interpretation of the Physical Basis of Kings and Times in the Early Kushan——Research on the Rabatak Inscription
下载PDF
导出
摘要 1993年,阿富汗巴格兰地区出土了一件贵霜新碑铭——腊跋闼柯碑铭。对腊跋闼柯铭文四位国王序列的释读,首次确立了早期贵霜的王系,也为迦腻色伽纪元问题的解决迎来了曙光。该铭文中,名号"王中之王"的书写规范,同时喻示了维玛.塔克图王的纪元法与安息纪元之间的联系。这一发现可以作为维玛·塔克图使用的"未知纪元"年代的判断依据,并为最终推算迦腻色伽所属年代和迦腻色伽纪元提供了新的可能。 Rabatak Inscription was excavated from Baghlan in Afghan in 1993, which recorded the first four Kus- han Kings'names, anti ascertained the ancestry of these four kings. Therefore, the discovery of the first four Kush- an Kings, which is very significant in Kushana study, established the early Kushana history for the first time. Meanwhile, the problem of Kanishka era comes to a new evidence. Significantly, the record rule in the new in- scription suggested the relationship between the Unknow Era used in Vima Takto period and the Arsacid Era. This discovery makes a clue for the King Kanishka~ Era which w~ n^rn^rl ~f~,~r h;m
作者 赵玲
出处 《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2012年第5期65-73,共9页 Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词 腊跋闼柯铭文 迦腻色伽 维玛·塔克图 Rabatak Inscription, Kanishka, Vima Takto
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Nicholas Sims - Williams, Joe Cribb. A New Bactrian In- scription of Kanihka the Great, Silk Road Art and Archae- oloty[ J ]. Vol. 4,1996:80.
  • 2Joe Cribb, the early Kushan Kings: New Evidence for Chronology. Evidence from the Rabatak Inscription of Kanishka I, in Michael Alram and Deborah E. Klimburg - Salter, eds. , Coins, Art, and Chronology [ C ]. Essays on the Pre - Islamic History of the Indo - Iranian Border- lands, Vienna: osterreichische Akademie der Wissen- schaften, 1999 : 180 -- 183.
  • 3B. N. Mukherjee. The great Kushana Testament[ J]. Indi- an Museum Bulletin,vol. 30, Calcutta, 1995: 10.
  • 4Osmund Bopearachchi. Some ovservations on the Chronol- oty of the Early Kushans[J]. Res Orientales, vol. XVII, 2007:41 -53.
  • 5余太山.新发现的腊跋闼柯铭文和《后汉书·西域传》有关阎膏珍的记载[J].新疆文物,2003(3-4).
  • 6J E van Lohuizen- de Leeuw. The' Scythian' Period[ M ]. Leiden, 1949 : 1.
  • 7Manoj K. Thakur, India in the Age of Kanihka [ M ]. Delhi : World View Pubilication, 1999:6 - 7.
  • 8重庆市文物局.三峡文物珍存--三峡工程重庆库区地下文物卷[M].北京:燕山出版社,2003:131.
  • 9张同标.论延光四年佛像的史学意义[J].淮阴工学院学报,2012,21(2):45-50. 被引量:6
  • 10弗格森 ( James Fergusson). On the Saka, Samvat, and Gupta Eras. A Supplement to His Paper on Indian Chro- nology[ J]. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland, New Series, Vol. 12, 1880:259 - 285.

二级参考文献64

  • 1詹义康.贵霜王衔研究[J].江西社会科学,1994,14(9):59-62. 被引量:2
  • 2Areal Kumar Jha and Sanjay Garg, eds. , Ex Moneta : Essays on Numismatics, History and Archaeology in Honour of Dr. David W. MacDowall, New Delhi: Harman Publishing House, 1998, p. 516.
  • 3Joe. Cribb, “The EarlyKushan Kings: New Evidence for Chronology. Evidence from the Rabatak Inscription of Kanishka I, ” in Michael Alram and Deborah E. Klimburg-Salter, eds., Coins, Art, and Chronology: Essays on the Pre- Islamic History of the lndofranian Borderlands, Vienna: Osterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1999, p. 180.
  • 4Nicholas Sims-Williams and Joe Cribb, “A New Bactrian Inscription of Kanishka the Great,” Silk RoadArt and Archaeology, vol. 4 (1996), p. 80.
  • 5B. N. Mukherjee, “The Great Kushana Testament,” Indian Museum Bulletin, vol. 30, Calcutta, 1995, pp. 10, 17.
  • 6Osmund Bopearachchi, “ SomeObservations on the Chronology of the Early Kushans, ” Res Orientales, vol. XVII, 2007, pp. 41-53.
  • 7余太山.《新发现的腊跋闼柯铭文和(后汉书·西域转>有关阎膏珍的记载》[J].新疆文物,2003,:43-47.
  • 8司马迁.《史记》卷123《大宛列传》,北京:中华书局,1959年,第3162页.
  • 9Strabo, Geography, XI, 8: 2, Loeb Classical Library, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1997.
  • 10W. W. Tam, The Greeks in Bactria and India, Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press, 1951, pp.277, 286, 533.

共引文献17

同被引文献25

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部