期刊文献+

国际典型科技智库的类型及其产品特点分析 被引量:48

Mold of Typical International Science and Technology Think Tanks and the Characters of their Products
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章以《美国宾夕法尼亚大学2011年全球智库报告》为基础,选取世界资源研究所、斯坦福国际研究中心、美国企业公共政策研究所、佐治亚理工学院政策分析与研究部、德国开发研究中心、欧洲联合研究中心、日本科技政策所、韩国科技政策所等8家6种类型的国际典型科技类智库作为研究样本,分析发现这些智库的产品优势和特点各不相同,并能给我国情报产品的发展带来启示,因而最后提出了我国情报产品的发展对策:拓展国际视野;建立定量化工具分析核心竞争力;建立合作密切的专家网;紧贴科研一线工作,注重基础类情报产品的研究;建立和加强与企业的合作。 Firstly,according to the "2011 The Global Go-To Think Tanks",we determine eight representative international scientific think tanks as the study sample,they are World Resources Institute,Stanford Research Institute,American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research,The Georgia Tech Research Institute's Office of Policy Analysis and Research,Center for Development Research,Joint Research Center,National Institute of Science and Technology Policy,Science and Technology Policy Institute.At the same time,we identified six types of science and technology think tanks.Secondly,we found that there are different advantages and characteristics of their respective products though analysis.At last,compared to the present development situation of the information products of our country,we give out some suggestions to strengthen the construction of our intelligence products to enhance the impact of the information products of our country.They are expanding the international perspective,establishing quantitative tools to analyze the core competitiveness,establishing close co-operation network of experts,closing the front line of research,focusing on the basis of intelligence products and establishing and strengthen cooperation with enterprises.
出处 《图书与情报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期93-98,共6页 Library & Information
基金 中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目“科技发展态势自动监测体系”研究成果之一
关键词 科技智库 情报产品 科技咨询 think tank intelligence product science and technology consult
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1曾静静等.资源环境科学思想库的运行机制及发展模式研究[R].兰州:中国科学院国家科学图书馆兰州分馆,2010:2-3.
  • 2胡劲松.关于情报产品概念的探讨[J].情报杂志,1994,13(5):50-52. 被引量:4
  • 3韩立栋,张艳鸣,胡鸣鸣.现代情报产品的价值与价格研究[J].现代情报,2002,22(10):162-163. 被引量:9
  • 4McGann J G. The global go to think tanks report 2011 [R]. Philadelphia: Think Tanks and Civil Societies Pro- gram International Relations Program, University of Pennsylvania, 2012 : 12.
  • 5National Institute of Science and Technology Policy [EB/ OL ]. [ 2012-09 -01 ].http ://www.nistep. go.j p/en/.
  • 6Science and Technology Policy Institute[EB/OL]. [2012 -09-03 ].http ://eng.stepi.re.kr/.
  • 7Joint Research Centre [EB/OL]. [2012-09-01 ].http ://ec. europa.eu/dgs/j rc/index.cfm.
  • 8The Center for Development Research [ EB/OL ]. [ 2012-08 -29]. http ://www.zef.de/publications.html.
  • 9Office of Policy Analysis and Research [EB/OL]. [2012- 08-25 ].http ://www.opar.gtri.gatech.edu/about.
  • 10Hayslett M, Pechar E. Science and Technology (S&T) Legislative Landscape: Mapping State-Level S&T Leg- islation in the US [R].Atlanta:Georgia Institute of Tech nology, 2009.

二级参考文献2

共引文献11

同被引文献483

引证文献48

二级引证文献347

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部