期刊文献+

肿瘤型M2丙酮酸激酶对肺癌诊断价值的Meta分析

Meta-analysis of diagnostic value of tumor M2 pyruvate kinase for lung cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的系统评价肿瘤型M2丙酮酸激酶对肺癌的诊断价值。方法全面检索Medline、Embase、中国期刊网、万方、维普等数据库,收集利用肿瘤型M2丙酮酸激酶诊断肺癌的文献。利用QUADAS评分工具评价纳入文献的质量。采用Meta-Disc 1.4软件计算合并敏感度、特异度、阳性似然比、阴性似然比、诊断优势比等指标,绘制汇总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线,并计算其曲线下面积。结果共12篇文献1 408例研究对象纳入本次Meta分析,分析结果显示,肿瘤型M2丙酮酸激酶对肺癌的综合诊断价值为:敏感度为70%,特异度为92%,阳性似然比为8.15,阴性似然比为0.34,诊断优势比为26.16。SROC曲线下面积为0.91。结论肿瘤型M2丙酮酸激酶对肺癌具有重要的诊断价值,与其他肿瘤标志物物联合检测可提高诊断准确性。 Objective To determine the accuracy of tumor M2 pyruvate kinase(Tu M2-PK) in diagnosis of lung cancer.Methods After a systematic review of studies on evaluation of Tu M2-PK in the diagnosis of lung cancer in Medline,Embase,CNKI,WanFang Data and VIP Information,the methodological quality of each study was assessed by QUADAS.Sensitivity,specificity,positive likelihood ratio,negative likelihood ratio,diagnostic odds ratio were pooled by employing Meta-Disc 1.4 software.Summary receiver operating characteristic(SROC) curve was made and the area under the curve(AUC) was calculated.Results 12 studies with 1 408 samples were included in the present meta-analysis.The summary estimates for Tu M2-PK in diagnosis of lung cancer showed that the sensitivity was 70%,specificity was 92%,positive likelihood ratio was 8.15,negative likelihood ratio was 0.34,diagnostic odds ratio was 26.16,and the AUC of SROC was 0.91.Conclusion Tu M2-PK plays an important role in the diagnosis of lung cancer,the combination of Tu M2-PK and other tumor biomarkers increase the diagnostic accuracy.
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2012年第30期10-12,15,共4页 China Medical Herald
关键词 肿瘤型M2丙酮酸激酶 肺癌 META分析 Tumor M2 pyruvate kinase Lung cancer Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Jemal A,Siegel R,Xu J,et al. Cancer statistics,2010 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2010,60(5 ) : 277-300.
  • 2陈万青,张思维,邹小农.中国肺癌发病死亡的估计和流行趋势研究[J].中国肺癌杂志,2010,13(5):488-493. 被引量:516
  • 3卢先锋,杨雪琴,张志敏,王东.肺癌血清肿瘤标志物meta分析[J].中国肺癌杂志,2010,13(12):1136-1140. 被引量:48
  • 4方伟达,梁文勇,余其昌.肿瘤型M2丙酮酸激酶在乳腺癌中表达的意义及其临床应用价值[J].中国医药导报,2010,7(35):22-23. 被引量:3
  • 5Mazurek S. Pyruvate kinase type M2:a key regulator of the metabolic tmdget system in tumor cells [J]. lnt J Biochem Cell Bio1,2011,43 (7): 969-980.
  • 6Moher D,Liberati A,Tetzlaff J,et al. PRISMA Group: Preferred report- ing items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses:the PRISMA state- ment [J]. Plos Med, 2009,6 : e 1000097.
  • 7Leeflang M M, Decks JJ.Gatsonis C ,et al. Cochrane Diagnostic Test Ac- curacy Working Group. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy [J]. Ann Intern Med,2008,149 : 889-897.
  • 8Whiting PF,Weswood ME,Rutjes AW,et al. Evaluation of QUADAS,a tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies [J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2006,6:9.
  • 9Zamora J,Abraira V,Muriel A,et al. Meta-DiSc:a software for meta- analysis of test accuracy data [J]. BMC Med Res Methodol,2006,6:31.
  • 10Deeks JJ,Macaskill P,Irwig L. The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed [J]. J Clin Epidemiol,2005,58 (9):882- 893.

二级参考文献140

共引文献690

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部