期刊文献+

自锁与普通直丝弓矫治体系的矫治效率比较 被引量:3

Comparison of orthodontic treatment efficiency between self-ligating brackets and straight wire appliance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨自锁与普通直丝弓矫治器的矫治效率。方法选择已完成矫治的自锁托槽治疗组24例和普通直丝弓治疗组41例的病历资料进行回顾性分析,比较自锁与普通直丝弓矫治器的矫治效率。结果在拔牙组,非拔牙组数据中,自锁直丝弓的有效复诊次数均少于普通直丝弓矫治组,两组比较结果差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论自锁直丝弓矫治的矫治效率要高于普通直丝弓矫治,而且其高效率优势主要集中在拔牙病例组。临床矫治效率高,值得推广。 Objective To discuss the orthodontic treatment efficiency between self-ligating brackets and straight wire appliance. Methods 65 completely treated cases were selected. 24 cases with malocclusion were treated by self-ligating brackets. The other 41 ones were treated by straight wire appliance. And we investigated the efficient difference between self-ligating brackets and straight wire appliance,the data were analyzed statistically. Results Among two sets of data from extraction treatment group and non-ex- traction ones, the visit times with self-ligating brackets were lower than straight wire appliance. There was obvious statistical differ- ence among two groups(P〈0.01). Conclusion The orthodontic treatment effects of self-ligating brackets were superior to straight wire appliance, especially in extraction cases.
出处 《重庆医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第31期3278-3279,共2页 Chongqing medicine
关键词 自锁托槽 普通直丝弓托槽 普通直丝弓 矫治效率 self-ligating brackets straight wire bracket straight wire appliance orthodontic treatment effects
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献102

共引文献107

同被引文献21

  • 1俞昳丽,钱玉芬.自锁托槽的临床应用及研究进展[J].上海口腔医学,2007,16(4):431-435. 被引量:20
  • 2Richmond S, Shaw WC, Roberts CT, et al. The PAR index ( peer as- sessment rating) :methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treat- ment in terms of improvement and standards [ J ]. Eur J Orthod, 1992,14(3) :180 - 187.
  • 3Richmond S, Shaw WC, OBrien KD, et al. The development of the PAR index ( Peer Assessment Rating ) : reliability and validity [ J ]. Eur J Orthod,1992,14(2) :125 -139.
  • 4DeGuzman L, Bahiraei D, Vig KW, et al. The validation of the peer assessment rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment diffi- culty[ J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1995, 107 (2): 172 - 176.
  • 5Leon - Salazar R, Janson G, Henriques JF, et al. Influence of initial occlusal severity on time and efficiency of Class I malocclusion treat- ment carried out with and without premolar extractions [ J ]. Dental Press J Orthod,2014,19(4) :38 -49.
  • 6Janson G, BmTos SE, de Freitas MR, et al. Class II treatment efficien- cy in maxillary premolar extraction and nonextraction protocols [ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2007,132(4) :490 -498.
  • 7Wahab RM,Idris H,Yacob H,et al. Comparison of self-and conven- tional-ligating brackets in the alignment stage [ J ]. Eur J Orthod, 2012,34(2) :176 - 181.
  • 8Songra G, Clover M, Atack NE, et al. Comparative assessment of a- lignment efficiency and space closure of active and passive self-liga- ting vs conventional appliances in adolescents:A single-center ran- domized controlled trial[ J ]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2014, 145(5) :569 -578.
  • 9孙晓蕾,刘新强,陈秀娟.自锁矫治器与传统结扎式矫治器用于拔牙矫治效率对比研究[J].中国实用口腔科杂志,2011,4(3):162-164. 被引量:5
  • 10李爱红,吕兰.拔除第三磨牙与第一前磨牙在正畸治疗的作用比较[J].现代预防医学,2012,39(4):1041-1042. 被引量:2

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部