期刊文献+

非融合技术在老年退变性腰椎疾病中的应用

Non-fusion motion preservation stabilization techniques for degenerative lumbar diseases in the elderly
下载PDF
导出
摘要 腰椎非融合外科技术因不固定脊柱节段,也许较融合术具有更多的优势。本文讨论了对于适合的老年患者,腰椎非融合术的主要类型、进展、适应证及禁忌证、存在的优势与不足。并对非融合技术在老年退变性腰椎疾病中的应用前景进行了展望。我们认为,各主要非融合技术在延缓治疗节段椎间盘退变的速度、保留该节段的运动功能、预防相邻节段的退变、减轻临床症状及改善生活质量等方面都显示出较融合术所具有的更多优势和更少的负面影响。 The non-fusion dynamic stabilization techniques maintain the motion of the lumbar vertebrae without fusion spinal segments, so it may have more advantages than fusion surgery. In this review, we discussed the main types, advance, indications and contraindications, advantages and disadvantages of the lumbar non-fusion surgical treatment for the eligible elderly patients. We believed that major non-fusion techniques had more advantages and less disadvantages in delaying the process of disc degeneration of the targeted segment, preserving the motion of segment, preventing degeneration of adjacent segments, alleviating clinical symptoms, and improving quality of life. There would be great prospect of the lumbar non-fusion surgery in the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases.
机构地区 空军总医院骨科
出处 《中华老年多器官疾病杂志》 2012年第10期776-778,共3页 Chinese Journal of Multiple Organ Diseases in the Elderly
关键词 非融合外科技术 老年人 腰椎 non-fusion surgical treatment elderly lumbar vertebrae
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Ekman P, MSller H, Shalabi A, et al. A prospective randomised study on the long-term effect of lumbar fusion on adjacent disc degeneration[J]. Eur Spine J, 2009, 18(8): 1175-1186.
  • 2Park CK, Ryu KS, Lee KY, et al. Clinical outcome of lumbar total disc replacement using ProDisc-L in degenerative discdisease: minimum 5-year follow-up results at a single institute[J]. Spine, 2012, 37(8): 672-677.
  • 3Choi Y, Kim K, So K. Adjacent segment instability after treatment with a Graf ligament at minimum 8 years' follow up[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009, 467(7): 1740-1746.
  • 4Schaeren S, Broger I, Jeanneret B. Minimum four-year follow-up of spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylo- listhesis treated with decompression and dynamic stabilization[J]. Spine, 2008, 33(18): E636-642.
  • 5Di Silvestr M, Lolli F, Bakaloudis G, et al. Dynamic stabilization for degenerative lumbar scoliosis in elderly patients[J]. Spine, 2010, 35(2): 227-234.
  • 6Zhang HY, Park JY, Cho BY. The BioFlex system as a dynamic stabilization device:does it preserve lumbar motion[J]? Korean Neurosurg Soc, 2009, 46(5): 431- 436.
  • 7Wilke HJ, Drumm J, Hiussler K, et al. Biomeehanical effect of different lumbar interspinous implants on flexibility and intradiscal pressure[J]. Eur Spine J, 2008, 17(8): 1049-1056.
  • 8Korovessis P, Repantis T, Zacharatos S, et al. Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion[J]? Eur Spine J, 2009, 18(6): 830-840.
  • 9Lin HS, Zhang GW, Wu H, et al. Treatment of bisegmental lumbar spinal stenosis: Coflex interspinous implant versus bisegmental posterior lumbar interbody fusion[J]. Sci Res Essays, 2011, 6(2): 479-484.
  • 10Park SC, Yoon SH, Hong YP, et al. Minimum 2-year follow-up result of degenerative spinal stenosis treated with interspinous U (Coflex)[J]. J Korean Neurosurg, 2009, 46(4): 292-299.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部