摘要
在司马迁的《史记·律书第三》的"律数"一节中,记述了两组音律数。其中有"黄钟长八寸七分一,宫"的一组数据,由于这一组律数错舛、音级位置窜乱。因此,至少自唐代以来至今的一千多年里,乐律学家们对这组律数的校勘工作从未停止过。文章对20世纪下半叶以来,由物理学家戴念祖先生在其所发表的《先秦管律的可能性》一文中所提出的据以校改的观点进行了商榷。文章除了采撷中国历代相关文献进行综合性的梳理以外,并在古文字学研究成果的基础上详加释证与补证,还通过必要的制管验声加以参证,进而在结论中阐明了据以校改的观点。
There were two sets of music temperament numbers recorded in the section of Temperament Numbers in Records of the Grand Historian-Lv Shu(treatises of Bells) by Sima Qian.And one of recording was "Huangzhong Chang bacon qifen yi,gong",which means that Huangzhong music temperament length 8 cun 7 fen1(cun,a unit of length(1/3 decimeter) that equals 10 fen and 1/10 chi;fen: a unit of length(1 fen = 1/3 centimeter or 1/10 cun).),its gong note.Since the numbers of music temperament was totally wrong,and the position of tone degrees arranged disorderly.Therefore,the scholars of temperament never stopping collated these numbers of music temperament for thousand years since the Tang Dynasty up to the present.The physicist Dai Nianzu published Possibility of Pupe Temperament in Pre-Qin Dynasty in the second half of the 20th century,some viewpoints of that book discussed in this paper.In addition to collect and comprehensive organize the related Chinese ancient literature in various dynasties;this paper explained the viewpoint of emendation?based on in the conclusion through making explaining and supplements evidence in details based on the results of researching paleography,as well as necessary making pipe to test sound for reference evidence.
出处
《黄钟(武汉音乐学院学报)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第4期79-88,203,共10页
Huangzhong:Journal of Wuhan Conservatory of Music
关键词
音律数
释证
参证
补证
制管验声
古文字学
戴念祖
《先秦管律的可能性》
商榷
number of music temperament
explaining evidence
reference evidence
supplement evidence
making pipe to test sound
paleography
Dai Nianzu(1942~)
Possibility of Pipe Temperament in Pre-Qin Dynasty
discussion