期刊文献+

锁定钢板治疗老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的临床分析

The Clinical Analysis of Locking Plate in the Treatment of Elderly Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨锁定接骨板治疗不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折的手术疗效。方法选择46例老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折患者为观察组,采用解剖锁定接骨板治疗,选择23例采用动力髋螺钉(DHS)固定法治疗老年不稳定型股骨粗隆间骨折患者为对照组,对其治疗效果进行回顾性分析,并作对比。结果术后随访4~16个月,平均10个月。观察组骨折愈合时间最短,术后的并发症也最少,与对照组相比,有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论解剖锁定接骨板治疗股骨粗隆间不稳定型骨折具有操作简单,固定牢固可靠,并发症少,骨折愈合率高,是治疗粗隆间不稳定型骨折的理想方法。 Objective To explore the surgical treatment for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures anatomic lock- ing plate. Methods Select 46 cases of elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture patients in the observation group, using anatomic locking plate treatment. Another retrospective chart review, 23 patients with dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation for the treatment of elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fracture patients in control group. Analyze the therapeutic effect retrospectively for com- parison. Results The postoperative follow-up of 4 to 16 months, an average of 10 months. The observation group fracture healing in the shortest time, postoperative complications are also at least compared with the control group, a significant difference (P〈0.05). Conclu- sions Anatomic locking plate treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fracture with a simple, fixed solid and reliable, with few complica- tions, the high rate of fracture healing, is the ideal method for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures.
机构地区 东莞市塘厦医院
出处 《菏泽医学专科学校学报》 2012年第3期12-14,共3页 Journal of Heze Medical College
关键词 股骨粗隆间骨折 治疗 老年人 动力髋螺钉固定法 锁定接骨板 Intertrochanteric unstable fracture/therapy elderly dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation anatomic locking plate
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献40

  • 1《骨折》[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2004,6(7). 被引量:37
  • 2刘振宇,刘长贵,李强.PFN与DCS治疗股骨转子下骨折的生物力学研究[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2006,21(12):971-973. 被引量:44
  • 3钟贵彬,侯春林,张伟,徐镇.微创内固定系统治疗骨折失误原因分析及对策(附三例报告)[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2007,22(2):164-165. 被引量:18
  • 4Cummings SR, Melton LJ. Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures[ J]. Lancet, 2002,9319 : 1761 - 1767.
  • 5Pioli G, Barone A, Giusti A, et al. Predictors of mortality sfter hip fracture: results from 1-year follow-up [ J ]. Aging Clin Exp Res, 2006,5:381 - 387.
  • 6Mohamde K, Copeland G, Boot DA, et al. An assessment of the POSSUM system in orthopaedic surgery [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br,2002,84:735 -739.
  • 7Bottle A, Aylin P. Mortality assoiated with delay in operation after hip fracture : observational study [ J ]. BMJ, 2006,7547:947 - 951.
  • 8Al-Ani AN, Samuelsson B, Tidermark J, et al. Eearly operation on patients with a hip fracture improved the ability to return to independent living, a prospective study of 850 patients[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am ,2008,7 : 1436 - 1442.
  • 9Casaletto JA, Gatt R. Post-operative mortality related to waiting time for hip fracture surgery [ J ]. Injury,2004,2 : 114 - 120.
  • 10Orosz GM, Magaziner J, Hannan EL, et al. Association of timing of surgery for hip fracture and patient outcomes [J]. JAMA, 2004,14 : 1738 - 1743.

共引文献124

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部