期刊文献+

光周期对油桃芽休眠诱导及呼吸代谢的影响 被引量:8

Effects of Photoperiod on Dormancy Induction and Respiration of Nectarine Buds
原文传递
导出
摘要 以‘曙光’(Prunus persica var.nectariana cv.Shuguang)油桃为试材,研究光周期对油桃芽休眠诱导进程以及对芽内底物水平的呼吸代谢运行的影响.结果表明:短日照使油桃芽提前进入休眠诱导,并促进休眠迅速加深,而长日照使休眠延迟.整个休眠诱导期内,叶芽和花芽的总呼吸速率先升高后降低.在底物水平上,随着休眠诱导的进行,三羧酸循环(TCA)略有下降,但仍维持高位运行,磷酸戊糖途径(PPP)在总呼吸中比例持续上升.短日照诱导相关的呼吸代谢变化提前出现,而长日照对相关呼吸代谢的变化具有推迟作用. The effect of photoperiod on the bud respiration based on substrate level during dormancy induction were studied with ‘Shuguang’ nectarine(Prunus persica var.nectariana cv.Shuguang) using oxygen-electrode system and respiratory inhibitors.The results showed that the total respiration of both leaf and blossom buds presented single peak curves during dormancy induction.On the substrate level,the tricarboxylic acid cycle(TCA) slightly decreased but still kept at a high level while the pentose phosphate pathway(PPP) increased during the whole period.Short-day radiation brought the buds into dormancy earlier and accelerated its deepening while long-day radiation had opposing effects.Relevant respiration was also advanced by short-day radiation treatment.Long-day radiation delayed the dormancy and had opposite influences on respiration.
出处 《应用与环境生物学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第5期838-842,共5页 Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology
基金 "十二五"国家科技支撑计划项目(No.2011BA D12B02) 山东省优秀中青年科学家科研奖励基金(No.BS2011NY011)资助~~
关键词 光周期 休眠诱导 油桃芽 三羧酸循环 磷酸戊糖途径 photo period dormancy induction nectarine bud tricarboxylic acid cycle pentose phosphate pathway
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献92

共引文献93

同被引文献80

  • 1王海波,李疆,高东升,王孝娣.桃带叶休眠的效果研究[J].新疆农业科学,2004,41(4):200-203. 被引量:2
  • 2王力荣,朱更瑞,左覃元.桃需冷量遗传特性的研究[J].果树科学,1996,13(4):237-240. 被引量:31
  • 3李政红,高东升,李宪利.桃芽自然休眠与两条主要电子传递途径变化的关系[J].植物生理与分子生物学学报,2006,32(2):156-162. 被引量:22
  • 4Bennett J, Jarvis P, Creasy G L, Michael C T. 2005. Trought influence of defoliation on overwintering carbohydrate reserves, return bloom, and yield of mature chardonnay grapevines. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 56:386 - 393.
  • 5Couvillon G A, Erez A. 1978. Effect of level and duration of high temperatures on rest in the peach. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 110:579 - 581.
  • 6Faust M, Erez A, Rowland L J, Wang S Y, Norman H A. 1997. Bud dormancy in perennial fruit trees: Physiological basis for dormancy induction, maintenance, and release. HortScience, 32:623 - 629.
  • 7Halaly T, Pang X Q, BatikoffT, Crane O, Keren A, Venkateswari J, Ogrodovitch A, Sadka A, Lavee S, Or E. 2008. Similar mechanisms might be triggered by alternative external stimuli that induce dormancy release in grape buds. Planta, 228 (1): 79 - 88.
  • 8Keilin T, Pang X, Venkateswari J, Halaly T. 2007. Digital expression profiling of grape EST collection leads to new insight into molecular events during grape-bud dormancy release. Plant Science, 173:446 - 457.
  • 9Lloyd J, Firth D. 1990. Effect of defoliationtime on depth ofdormancy and bloom time forlowchillpeaches. HortScience, 25 (12): 1575 - 1578.
  • 10Marquat C, Vandamme M, Gendmud M, P6tal G. 1999. Dormancy in vegetative bud of peach: Relation between carbohydrate absorption potentials and carbohydrate concentration in the bud during dormancy and its release. Scientia Horticulturae, 79:151 - 162.

引证文献8

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部