期刊文献+

法院证据调查与当事人主义 被引量:1

A Research on the System of Evidence Investigation and Collection in Court with the Adversary System
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国审判方式改革在批判超职权主义观念的基础上,主张向当事人主义的目标发展,大大削弱了法官依据职权调查证据的权力。本文通过对大陆法系和英美法系的当事人主义诉讼模式的分析发现,对真实的追求是民事诉讼的真谛,当事人主义并不排斥法院实施证据调查。我国应当通过法院证据调查制度的规范化促进司法者能动地输出司法正义。 China's Civil Trial Reform criticizes the super-ex officio doctrine and advocates developing the adversary system on weakening the court's power on evidence investigation and collection.On the research of comparison the adversary systemJs concept in civil law system and common law system;we find that truth-finding is the true essence of civil procedure law;and the adversary system doesn't exclude the court's power on evidence investigation and collection.We should develop this system on court's evidence investigation and collection to promote the counter create the justice proactively by its standardization.
作者 李晓丽
机构地区 东北财经大学
出处 《行政与法》 2012年第10期95-101,共7页 Administration and Law
关键词 证据调查 申请调查 职权调查 investigation and collecting of evidence evidence-collecting depending on application authority to collect evidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1[日]新堂幸司.林剑锋译.新民事诉讼法[M].法律出版社,2008.486,486,489,487,490,489.
  • 2田平安,刘春梅.试论协同型民事诉讼模式的建立[J].现代法学,2003,25(1):83-88. 被引量:116
  • 3[德]汉斯·约阿希姆·穆泽拉克.德国民事诉讼法基础教程[M].周翠译.中国政法大学出版社,2005. .
  • 4[日]高桥宏志.民事诉讼法:制度与理论的深层分析[M].林剑锋译.法律出版社,2006.
  • 5[日]三,月章.日本民事诉讼法[M].汪一凡译.五南图书出版公司,1997.

二级参考文献10

共引文献119

同被引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部