摘要
我国审判方式改革在批判超职权主义观念的基础上,主张向当事人主义的目标发展,大大削弱了法官依据职权调查证据的权力。本文通过对大陆法系和英美法系的当事人主义诉讼模式的分析发现,对真实的追求是民事诉讼的真谛,当事人主义并不排斥法院实施证据调查。我国应当通过法院证据调查制度的规范化促进司法者能动地输出司法正义。
China's Civil Trial Reform criticizes the super-ex officio doctrine and advocates developing the adversary system on weakening the court's power on evidence investigation and collection.On the research of comparison the adversary systemJs concept in civil law system and common law system;we find that truth-finding is the true essence of civil procedure law;and the adversary system doesn't exclude the court's power on evidence investigation and collection.We should develop this system on court's evidence investigation and collection to promote the counter create the justice proactively by its standardization.
出处
《行政与法》
2012年第10期95-101,共7页
Administration and Law
关键词
证据调查
申请调查
职权调查
investigation and collecting of evidence
evidence-collecting depending on application
authority to collect evidence