期刊文献+

乳腺癌雌孕激素受体与DNA倍体表达的临床意义 被引量:2

Clinical significance of ER、PR and DNA ploid Expression in breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 :探讨乳腺癌雌、孕激素受体和DNA倍体表达的临床意义。方法 :采用高敏感的SP免疫组化法检测雌、孕激素受体和采用流式细胞检测DNA倍体在乳腺癌中的表达。结果 :143例乳腺癌中ER(+) /PR(+)者 78例 ,ER(+) /PR(- ) 18例 ,ER(- ) /PR(+) 12例 ,ER(- ) /PR(- ) 35例 ,ER(+)者 96例 ,占 6 7 1% ,PR(+)者 90例 ,占 6 2 9%。ER表达状况与年龄、肿瘤大小、淋巴结转移无关 (P >0 0 5) ,ER(+)者预后较好 ,3年生存率为 93 75% ,ER(- )者仅 53 2 % ,两者显著差别P <0 0 5,56例乳腺癌中 ,二倍体 2 2例 ,四倍体 9例 ,异倍体 2 5例 ,DNA倍体与年龄、肿瘤大小、淋巴结转移无关 ,(P >0 0 5) ,而二、四倍体肿瘤预后较好 ,3年生存率分别为 95 5%和 88 7% ,5年生存率分别为 90 2 %和77 8% ,异倍体预后较差 ,3年生存率仅 6 0 % ,5年生存率仅 56 %。结论 :ER和DNA倍体表达和预后密切相关 (P >0 0 5) ,可作为判断预后的指标。 Objective:To evaluate the clinical significance of ER、PR and DNA ploid expression in the breast cancer Methods:ER、PR in patients with breast cancer were examined by the method of ABC immunohistochemistry and DNA ploid were analyzed by FCM Results:In 143 patients with breast cancer,ER(+)PR(+)were in 78 cases ER(+)PR(-)in18,ER(-)PR(+)in 12 and ER(-)PR(-)in 35 All of ER(+)were 96 cases(67 1%) and PR(+)in 90(62 9%),ER(-)in47(32 8%)PR(-)in 53(37%) There were no relation ship between ER(+)or (-)expression and age,tumor size,lymphnode metastasis ER(+)cases have a good prognosis,3 years survivel rate was 93 7% and ER(-)case was 53 2%( P >0 05) In 56 patients,diploid in 22 cases,tetraploid in 9 and aneuploid in 25 There were no relationship between DNA ploid and age、tumor size,lymphnod metastasis Tumour of diploid and tetraploid has a good prognosis, 3 years survival rate was 95 5% and 88 7% respectively, 5 years survival rate was 90 2% and 77 8% respectively Aneu ploid has a bad prognosis,3 years survival rate was 60% and 5 years survival rate was 56% Conclusions:There were significant relationship between ER,DNA ploid expression and prognosis( P <0 05);they may be a important predictors to decide the prognosis of breast cancer
出处 《肿瘤防治杂志》 2000年第2期129-131,共3页 China Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 乳腺癌 孕激素受体 DNA倍体 雌激素受体 breast cancer ER,PR DNA ploid
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Kinne DW,et al.Estrogtu receptor protein inbreast cancer as a predictor of recurrence[J].Cancer,1981,47(10):2364-2766.
  • 2姜军,詹新恩,傅晓岚,李才安.乳腺癌术后长期存活及二年内复发者DNA含量分析[J].普外基础与临床杂志,1994,1(1):39-42. 被引量:2
  • 3Yuan J,Hennessy C,Givan A,et al.Predicting outcome for patients with node negativebreast cancer: a comparative study of flow cytometry and cell image analysis fordetermination of DNA ploid[J].Br J.Cancer 1992,65(3):461-463.
  • 4Haffty B,Toth M,Flgnn S,et al.Prognosise value of DNA flow cytometry in the locallyrecurrent,conservatively treated breast cancer patients[J].J,Clin Oncal1992,10(12):1839-1840.
  • 5Hatschek T,Wingren S,Carstusen,et al.DNA Content and S-phase fraction in malebreast carcimomas[J].Acta Oncal.1994,33(6):609-610.
  • 6Joeusuu H,Alanenk,Falkmer U,et al.Effect of DNA ploid classification on prognosisin breast cancer[J].Int J Cancer 1992,52(5):701-703. 修回日期:1999-12-10

共引文献1

同被引文献5

  • 1沈镇宇.乳腺肿瘤学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2005.370-371.
  • 2Shannon C,Smith I. Is there still a role for neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer[J]? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol,2003,45(1) : 77-90.
  • 3Carmichael AR, Bendall S, Lockerbiel, et al. The long-term outcome of synchronous bilateral breast cancer is worse than metachronous or unilateral tumours[J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2002,28(4) :388-391.
  • 4王克有,游凯涛.原发性双侧乳腺癌[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,1998,5(2):40-41. 被引量:7
  • 5胡梅齐,王兴华,蒋寿宁,舒志军,孔繁恩.双侧乳腺癌的预后因素[J].中国癌症杂志,2002,12(2):137-140. 被引量:14

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部