期刊文献+

ADC值在鉴别脊椎良恶性压缩骨折中的价值 被引量:9

Differential Diagnosis Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Benign and Malignant Vertebral Compression Fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨弥散加权成像(Diffusion weighted imaging,DWI)中ADC值在鉴别脊椎良恶性压缩骨折中的价值。方法回顾分析经病理和(或)临床随访证实的椎体压缩骨折85例共147节椎体,其中恶性组55例共100节椎体;良性组30例共47节;选取同一患者病变椎体附近的正常椎体组成对照组69例共69节椎体。b值为0、300s/mm2。并测量良性组、恶性组及对照组相应椎体的表观弥散系数(apparent diffusion coefficient,ADC)值,计数并做统计学分析。结果良性组、恶性组及对照组ADC值分别为:(6.95±1.97)×10-4mm2/s、(4.54±1.10)×10-4mm2/s及(1.41±0.84)×10-4mm2/s,经T检验,良恶性组间、良恶性组与对照组间ADC值差异均有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论 ADC值定量测定对鉴别脊椎良恶性压缩骨折的病因有一定价值,但部分存在重叠。 Objective To evaluate the differential diagnosis value of apparent diffusion coeffient (ADC) values in benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures. Method Retrospective review of diffusion weighted MR (SE EPI sequence) of 85 patients (147 vertebral fractures) with pathologically or (and) clinically proven, of which 55 were malig- nant fractures, and 30 benign fractures (1 7 traumatic: 13 osteoporotic). The contrast group was composed of 69 patients with 69 normal vertebrae adjacent to abnormal vertebrae. The b-value was 0, 300s/mm2. Apparent diffusion coeffient (ADC) values of normal and abnor- mal vertebral bodies were calculated. ADC values of vertebral bodies were quantitatively analyzed and compared in the benign, malignant and normal groups. Resttlts ADC vahtes of benign, malignant and normal group were (6.95 ± 1.97) ×10-4mm2/s, (4.54 ± 1.10) × 10 -4mm2/s and (1 .41± 0.84)× 10-4mm2/s respectively; the differences of ADC values were statistically significant among benign, malignant and normal group (P〈0.05). Concluion Difference ADC value were useful in differentiating benign from malignant vertebral body compression fractures, but there might be overlapped of them.
出处 《中国CT和MRI杂志》 2012年第5期82-85,共4页 Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
基金 四川省卫生厅科研项目(编号:100153)
关键词 脊椎 骨折 磁共振成像 弥散加权成像 Vertebra Compression fraclure Magnetic resonance imaging, Diffusion weighted imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Zhou XJ,Leeds NE,Mckinnon GC. Characterization of benign and metastatic vertebral compression fractures with quantitative diffusion MR Imaging[J].American Journal of Neuroradiology,2002,(01):165-170.
  • 2Baur A,Stabler A,Bruning R. Diffusion weighted MR imaging of bone marrow:differentiation of benign versus pathologic compression fractures[J].Radiology,1998,(02):349-356.
  • 3Marcel C,Kremer S,Jeantroux J. Diffusion weighted imaging in noncompressive myelopathies:a 33-patient prospective study[J].Journal of Neurology,2010,(09):1438-1445.
  • 4Chan JHM,Peh WCG,Tsui EYK. Acute vertebral body compression fractures:discrimination between benign and malignant causes using apparent coefficients[J].British Journal of Radiology,2002,(03):207-214.
  • 5Vaccaro AR,Shah SH,Schweitzer ME. MRI description of vertebral osteomyelitis,neoplasm,and compression fracture[J].Orthopedics,1999,(01):67-73.
  • 6姚成刚,宋法亮,方佳,王建萍.MR表观扩散系数定量测定对椎体单纯性和病理性骨折鉴别诊断价值的研究[J].放射学实践,2008,23(10):1140-1145. 被引量:13
  • 7姚伟武,李明华,杨世埙,乔瑞华,何鸿渊,杜联军.MR弥散技术对脊柱压缩性骨折诊断价值初探[J].放射学实践,2003,18(4):258-260. 被引量:11
  • 8Byun WM,Shin SO,Chang Y. Diffusion weighted MR imaging of metastatic disease of the spine:assessment of response to therapy[J].American Journal of Neuroradiology,2002,(06):906-912.
  • 9Balliu E,Vilanova JC,Pel á ez I. Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficients to differentiate benign from malignant vertebral bone marrow lesions[J].European Journal of Radiology,2009,(03):560-566.
  • 10姚伟武,李明华,杨世埙,乔瑞华,何鸿渊.MR表观弥散系数定量测定对脊柱压缩性骨折病因的诊断价值研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2004,23(7):605-609. 被引量:24

二级参考文献54

  • 1高嵩,包尚联.扩散时间及扩散梯度磁场对水分子表观扩散系数的影响[J].生物医学工程学杂志,2008,25(3):542-546. 被引量:7
  • 2沈艳,李明华,姚伟武,杨世埙,李文彬,乔瑞华.MR化学位移成像在脊柱病变中的应用研究[J].放射学实践,2006,21(7):712-715. 被引量:3
  • 3[1]Laredo JD,Quessar AE,Bossard P,et al.Vertebral tumors and pseudotumors[J].Radiol Clin North Am,2001,39(1):137-163.
  • 4[2]Baur A,Stabler A,Bruning R,et al.Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of bone marrow:differentiation of begnin versus pathologic compression fractures[J].Radiology,1998,207(2):349-356.
  • 5[3]Castillo M,Arbelaez A,Smith JK,et al.Diffusion-weighted MR imaging offers no advantage over routine noncontrast MR imaging in the detection of vertebral metastases[J].AJNR,2000,21(5):948-953.
  • 6[4]William TCY,Charles KZ,Thomas JB,et al.Vertebral compression fractures:distinction between benign and malignant causes with MR imaging[J].Radiology 1989,172(1):215-218.
  • 7[5]Baker LL,Goodman SB,Inder P,et al.Benign versus pathologic compression fractures of vertebral bodies:assessment with conventional spin-echo,chemical shift,and STIR MR imaging[J].Radiology,1990,174(2):495-502.
  • 8[6]Charles CA,Laredo JD,Chevret S,et al.Acute vertebral collapse due to osteoporosis or malignancy:appearance on unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MRI[J].Radiology,1996,199(2):541-549.
  • 9[7]Finelli DA.Diffusion-weighted imaging of acute vertebral compressions:specific diagnosis of benign versus malignant pathologic fracture[J].AJNR,2001,22(2):241-245
  • 10[8]Mintorovitch J,Moseley ME,Chileuitt L,et al.Comparison of diffusion and T2-weighted MRI for the early detection of cerebral ischemia and reperfusion in rats[J].Mag Res in Med,1991,18(1):39-50.

共引文献49

同被引文献84

  • 1汤光宇,姚冀平,徐彧,刘勇,李伟,顾伟中.鉴别良、恶性椎体骨折的最佳扩散敏感系数值的探讨[J].中华放射学杂志,2004,38(6):615-619. 被引量:29
  • 2崔建岭,孙军辉,郭志远,马晓晖,谢兰新,刘记存.SD大鼠骨肉瘤坏死区DWI的实验研究初探[J].放射学实践,2005,20(11):945-949. 被引量:3
  • 3Zairi F, D'Houtaud S, Assaker R.Surgical treatment of vertebral metastases[J].Bull Cancer, 2013,100(11):1141-1151.
  • 4Weiss R J, Wedin R. Surgery for skeletal metastases in lung cancer[J].Acta Orthop, 2011,82(1):96-101.
  • 5Lecouvet FE, Larbi A, Pasoglou V, et al. MRI for response assessment in metastatic bone disease[J].Eur Radiol, 2013,23(7): 1986-1997.
  • 6Fanucci E,Manenti G,Masala S,et al.Multiparameter characterization of vertebral osteoporosis with 3-T MR[J].Radiol Med,2007,112(2):208-223.
  • 7Jaramillo,D,Connolly,SA,Vajapeyam,S,et al.Normal and ischemic epiphysis of the femur:diffusion MR imaging study in piglets[J].Radiology,2003,227(3):825-832.
  • 8Nonomura,Y,Yasumoto,M,Yoshimura,R,et al.Relationship between bone marrow cellularity and apparent diffusion coefficient[J].J Magn Reson Imaging,2001,13(5):757-760.
  • 9Li,Q,Pan,SN,Yin,YM,et al.Normal cranial bone marrow MR imaging pattern with age-related ADC value distribution[J].Eur J Radiol,2011,80(2):471-477.
  • 10Biffar,A,Dietrich,O,Sourbron,S,et al.Diffusion and perfusion imaging of bone marrow[J].Eur J Radiol,2010,76(3):323-328.

引证文献9

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部