1Roth well PM,Villagra R, Gibson R,et al. Evidence of a chronic sys-temic cause of instability of atherosclerotic plaques [ J] . Lancet,2000,355:19 -24.
2Kenichi T, Anabu W, Ryuzo F,et al. Imaging of distal internal ca-rotid artery by ultrasonography with a 3. 5 MHz convex prob[ J].Stroke,2002,33 : 1792 -1794.
4Sun Y Lin CH,Lu CJ,Chen RC,et al. Carotid atherosclerosis,inti-ma media thickness and risk factors. an analysis of 1781 asympto-matic subjects in Taiwan[ J]. Atherosclero,2002,164 :89 -94.
5Naghav M,Libby P, Falk E. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerablepatient [J], Circulation ,2003’14(108) :172 - 177.
7Holaj R,Spacil J,Petrasek J,et al. Intima - media thickness of thecommon carotid artery is the significant predictor of angiographicallyproven coronary artery disease [ J]. Can J Cardiol, 2003,19 : 670-676.
8Oleary DH,Polak JF. Intima media thickness:a tool for atheroscle-rosis im - aging and event prediction[ J]. Am J Cardiol,2002,90 :18-21.
2Got tdiener JS,Bednarz J, Devereux R, et al. American Society oi Echocardiography recommendations for use of echocardiography in clinical trials. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2004,17 :1086-1119.
3Stensland-Bugge E, Bonaa KH, Joakimsen O. Reproducibility of ultrasonographically determined intima media thickness is dependent on arterial wall thickness. The Tromso Study. Stroke, 1997,28:1972- 1980.
4Tang R, Hennig M, Thomasson B, et al. Baseline reproducibility of B-mode ultrasonic measurement of carotid artery intima-media thickness: the European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis (ELSA). J Hypertens, 2000,18 : 197-201.
5Gonzalez J, Wood JC, Dorey FJ, et al. Reproducibility of carotid intima media thickness measurements in young adults. Radiology, 2008,247 : 465-471.
6Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet,1986,1:307 -310.
7Roman MJ, Naqvi TZ, Gardin JM, et al. Clinical application of noninvasive vascular ultrasound in cardiovascular risk stratification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Vascular Medicine and Biology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr,2006,19:943-954.
8Bots ML, Hoes AW, Koudstaal P J, et al. Common carotid intimamedia thickness and risk of stroke and myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation, 1997,96 : 1432-1437.
9Hollander M, Hak AE, Koudstaal P J, et al. Comparison between measures of atherosclerosis and risk of stroke: the Rotterdam Study. Stroke,2003,34:2367-2372.
10Liu L,Zhao F, Yang Y, et al. The clinical significance of carotid intima-media thickness in cardiovascular diseases: a survey in Beijing. J Hum Hypertens,2008,22:259 -265.