期刊文献+

195例子宫颈病变LEEP术后切缘状态及全子宫切除标本病变残留情况的分析 被引量:9

The state of resection margin after LEEP conization for cervical lesions and subsequent residual lesion after hysterectomy:a clinical study of 195 case
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨宫颈病变LEEP术后切缘状态以及全子宫切除标本中病变残留情况。方法:收集2008年11月至2009年6月本院195例LEEP术后行全子宫切除术病例的临床病理资料,对比分析其LEEP术后切缘状态及全子宫切除标本病变残留情况。结果:在本院行阴道镜下多点活检组织学诊断的162例患者,其活检诊断与LEEP术后病理诊断的总体完全符合率为75.3%,LEEP术后病理诊断升级者占19.8%,降级者占4.9%。195例患者中,128例因LEEP切缘阳性行全子宫切除术,67例切缘阴性者因其他高危因素行全子宫切除术。128例LEEP切缘阳性患者中,75.8%未在全子宫切除标本中发现任何上皮内病变;当LEEP切缘为HSIL、CIS、微小浸润癌和浸润癌时,子宫颈中HSIL以上程度病变残留率分别为13.2%、19.6%、21.7%和70.0%,HSIL以上程度的病变残留率随LEEP切缘病变程度增加而升高。67例LEEP切缘阴性者的全子宫切除标本中,4例(6.0%)发现残留病灶。结论:除LEEP切缘为浸润癌阳性,其它阳性切缘状态并非必须行全子宫切除术,而需进一步评估。规范LEEP过程可能有助于减少阳性切缘比例。 Objective:To explore the state of resection margin after Loop electrosurgical excision procedure(LEEP) conization for cervical lesions and subsequent residual portion of lesions after hysterectomy.Methods:The relevant clinical data were collected during the period from Nov.2008 to June 2009,including 195 cases of hysterectomy after LEEP conization.The state of resection margin after LEEP conization was compared with the residual state of lesions after hysterectomy.Results:Out of 162 patients undergoing colposcopic biopsy,75.3% had the biopsy diagnosis equivalent to the pathological diagnosis,with 19.8% upgraded and 4.9 % downgraded in the grades of the lesion.Of the 195 cases,128 cases showed positive resection margin,while 67 cases showed negative and underwent hysterectomy due to other risk factors.No residual focus was found in 75.8% of the cases with positive resection margin after hysterectomy.The residual rate after hysterectomy corresponded directly to the resction margin of the lesion.The residual rates above HSIL were 13.2% and 19.6% when the margins were HSIL and CIS respectively,and the residual rate turned to be 21.7% if the cutting margin was microinvasive carcinoma and 70.0% for invasive carcinoma.Residual diseases were found in 5.97%(4/67)patients with negative margins.Conclusion:hysterectomy is not required as necessary treatment for those cases with positive resection margin except for positive invasive carcinoma,but further evaluation is a must.Standard LEEP with normal procedures may be conducive to reduce the proportion of positive resetion margin.
出处 《现代妇产科进展》 CSCD 2012年第10期764-767,共4页 Progress in Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 宫颈电环切除术(LEEP) 锥形切除术 子宫切除术 阴道镜检查 活组织检查 子宫颈 宫颈上皮内瘤样病变 子宫颈肿瘤 切缘 Loop electrosurgical excision procedure Conization Hysterectomy Colposcopy Biopsy Cervix Uteri Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Uterine cervical neoplasms Margin
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Crum CP,Kurman MD. Precancerous lesions of the cervix [ M ]// Kurman R J, Ronnett BM, Ellenson LH. Blaustein" s Pathology of the Female Genital Tract. 6th. Springer New York Dodrecht Heidlberg London,2010:252-323.
  • 2Bonardi R, Cecchini S, Grazzini G, et al. Loop electrosur- gical excision procedure of the transformation zone and colposcopically directed punch biopsy in the diagnosis of cervical lesions[ J ]. Obstet Gynecol, 1992,80 (6) : 1020- 1022.
  • 3Lee KE, Koh CF, Watt WF. Comparison of the grade of CIN in colposcopically directed biopsies with that in out- patient loop eledtrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) specimens : a retrospective review [ J ]. Singapore Med I, 1999,40( 11 ) :694-696.
  • 4Miyazaki K, Hiromura K, Minami K, et al. Diagnostic ac- curacy and time-course change of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [ J ]. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho, 2008,35 ( 9 ) : 1541-1545.
  • 5Felix JC, Muderspach LI, Duggan BD, et al. The signifi- cance of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone bi- opsies[ J]. Obstet Gynecol 1994,84:996-1000.
  • 6Kim HJ, Kim KR, Mok JE, et al. Pathologic risk factors for predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy following LEEP conization [ J ]. Gynecol Oncol, 2007,105 (2) :434-438.
  • 7Costa S, De Nuzzo M, Infante FE, et al. Disease persist- ence in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia un- dergoing eletrosurgical conization [ J ]. Gynecol Oncol, 2002,85 ( 1 ) : 119-245.
  • 8Ait Menguellet S, Collinet P, Houfflin Debarge V, et al. Management of muhicentric lesions of the lower genital tract I J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol,2007,132 (1) :116-120.
  • 9Cardoza-Favarato G, Fadare O. High-grade squamous in- traepithelial lesion (CIN 2 and 3) excised with negative margins by loop electrosurgical excision procedure: the significance of CIN 1 at the margins of excision [ J ]. Hum Pathol,2007,38 (5) :781-786.

同被引文献67

  • 1吴绪峰,曾蓉,高晗,蔡鸿宁.宫颈锥切术后全子宫切除的CINⅢ患者病灶残留相关因素分析[J].肿瘤防治研究,2014,41(6):614-617. 被引量:15
  • 2郎景和.宫颈病变的诊治[J].现代妇产科进展,2005,14(5):341-352. 被引量:127
  • 3Suwannarurk K,Bhamarapravati S,Thaweekul Y,et al.The accuracy of cervical cancer and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis with loop electrosurgical excisional procedure under colposcopic vision[J].J Gynecol Oncol,2009,20(1):35-38.
  • 4Melnikow J,McGahan C,Sawaya GF,et al.Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia outcomes after treatment:long-term follow-up from the British Columbia Cohort Study[J].J Natl Cancer Inst,2009,101(10):721-728.
  • 5Wright TC,Cox T,Massad LS,et al.2001 Consen-sus guidelines for the management of women withcervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J].Am J Obstet Gynecol,2003,189(1):295-304.
  • 6邵为荣,张雪涛,李凡,王妍.PCR和免疫组化SP法评价重组人干扰素α2b阴道泡腾片治疗宫颈糜烂患者相关病毒感染的疗效[J].中国妇幼保健,2007,22(36):5185-5187. 被引量:37
  • 7Srivastava S, Shahi UP, Dibya A, et al. Distribution of HPV Genotypes and Involvement of Risk Factors in Cervical Lesions and Invasive Cervical Cancer: A Study in an Indian Population [J] .IntJMolCellMed, 2014, 3 (2): 61 -73.
  • 8Martfnez Lomakin F, Tobar C. Accuracy of point - of - care serum creatinine devices for detecting patients at risk of con- trast- induced nephropathy: a critical overview [J] . Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci, 2014, 51 (6) : 332 -343.
  • 9Koay MH, Crook M, Stewart CJ. Fascin expression in cervi- cal normal squamous epithelium, cervical intraepithelial neo- plasia, and superficially invasive (stage [A1 ) squamous car- cinoma of the cervix [J] . Pathology, 2014, 46 (5): 433 - 438.
  • 10Lukas Hefler,Christoph Grimm,Verena Kueronya,Clemens Tempfer,Alexander Reinthaller,Stephan Polterauer.??A novel training model for the loop electrosurgical excision procedure(J)American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology . 2012 (6)

引证文献9

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部