全国人大常委会立法政策反思——以立法修改背景下的司法解释为例的分析

Reflections on Legislative Policy of the Standing Committee of People's Congress:An Analysis on Judicial Interpretation in the Context of Amendments of Law

司法解释的存在应以必要为原则,全国人大常委会作为立法者应充分利用主客观条件尽可能使法律完善,不应人为制造司法解释存在的制度空间。立法在修改时,应充分吸收既有司法解释和司法实践经验,有效回应司法的现实需求。近年来,多部法律修改后既有司法解释继续施行、法律修改后最高人民法院根据立法前经验制定新司法解释等现象的存在表明,全国人大常委会在立法中,在一定程度上仍然未能充分而有效地吸收既有司法解释和司法实践经验。在法律体系初步建成的条件下,全国人大常委会在立法中,应严格限制"法律不宜太细"政策的适用,全面转向以司法为中心,立法在制定和在修改时,应当充分吸收既有司法解释和司法实践经验,更为有效地回应司法实践中急需解决的各种问题。

Judicial interpretation should be limited to necessity, the Standing Committee of People＇s Con- gress should make use of all existing facilities to make laws as perfect as possible, but not leave possibilities for judicial interpretations. When amending laws, judicial interpretations and judicial experiences should be referred to reflect the realist requirements. In recent years, some judicial interpretations went on to be applica ble after the amendments of relative laws, new judicial interpretations were published by the Supreme Court by previous experiences when new amending laws issued. This means that the reference of existing judicial experi ences of the legislator is not adequate. It is necessary for the People＇ s Congress to change tion to be more detailed to center the judiciary and response effectively various problems its notion of legisla- in judicial practice.