期刊文献+

框架结构在双向地震动作用下的最大结构反应 被引量:3

THE MAXIMUM STRUCTURAL RESPONSE OF STRUCTURES UNDER BI-DIRECTIONAL ESRTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS
原文传递
导出
摘要 实际地震由水平地震动和竖向地震动组成。由于水平地震动可能沿任何方向发生,通常把引起结构最大动力反应的水平地震动角度称为地震对该结构的最不利入射角度。确定地震动的最不利入射角度是研究双向地震作用下结构动力响应的关键问题。该文提出了一种基于弹性时程分析的地震动最不利入射角度的确定方法,并给出了该方法的图形解法。该文通过具体算例证实,当结构为线弹性时,该方法给出的是动力响应的精确解。当结构进入非线性阶段,产生塑性变形时,该文对该方法引起的误差进行了讨论,发现误差随强度折减系数(Rd)的增加而增大,在Rd小于6时,误差通常不超过10%,证明该文所提出的方法在结构发生塑性变形时依然具有很好的适用性。 Translational ground motion is decomposed usually into three components: two horizontal components and one vertical component. As the maximum structure response may occur in any direction along the structure, usually the direction of the horizontal component, in which the maximum structure response occurs, is known as the critical orientation. The determination of the critical orientation is one of the key issues in bi-directional seismic excitation studies. In this paper, based on time history analysis results, a method is proposed to determine the critical angle of the structure response under a bi-directional seismic excitation as well as a graphic solution to the method. It is proved that for structures of linear elastic materials, this method gives exact solutions. In the meantime, the accuracy of the method for nonlinear-material structure is analyzed in this paper. The analysis shows that the method introduces an error increasing as the section strength reduction factor (Rd) grows, which stays below 10% while Rd is less than 6. It is shown that the structural response caused by the earthquake excitation in the critical angle of seismic incidence calculated by the proposed method is reasonably close to the maximum response in the random orientation of earthquakes.
出处 《工程力学》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第11期129-136,共8页 Engineering Mechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目(90815006) 清华大学自主科研计划项目(20101081766)
关键词 地震反应 随机方向 最大入射角 塑性 图形解法 seismic response critical orientation incidence angle plastic graphic solution
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1ISO 3010: 2001, Bases for design of structures- seismic actions on structures [S]. Geneva Switzerland: International Organization for Standard, 2001.
  • 2AASHTO Standard specification for highway bridges [S]. Washington: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 1996.
  • 3ATC32, Improved seismic design criteria for California bridges: Provisional recommendations IS]. California USA: Applied Technology Council, 1996.
  • 4European 8: Design of stractures for earthquake resistence [S]. Great Britian: European Committee for Standardization, 2004.
  • 5De Stefano M, Faella G, Ramasco R. Inelastic seismic response of one-way plan-asymmetric under bi-dimensional ground motions [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1998, 27: 363- 376.
  • 6Heredia-Zavoni E, Machicao-Borrniuevo C. Response to orthogonal components of ground motion and assessment of percentage combination rules [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1999, 33: 271- 284.
  • 7Rigato A B, Medina R A. Influence of angle of incidence on seismic demands for inelastic single-storey structures subjected to bi-directional ground motions [J]. Eng Struct, 2007, 29(10): 2593-2601.
  • 8Wilson E L, Suharwardy A, Habibullah A. A clarification of the orthogonal effects in a tree-dimensional seismic analysis [J]. Earthq Spectra, 1995, 11(4): 659-666.
  • 9Lopez O A, Torres R. The critical angle of seismic incidence and the maximum structural response [J]. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn, 1997, 26:881 -894.
  • 10Menun C, Der Kiureghian A. Envelopes for seismic response vectors. I: Theory [J]. Struct Eng, 2000, 126: 467 -473.

同被引文献22

  • 1GB50011-2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
  • 2李宏男.结构多维抗震理论[M].北京:科学出版社,2006.60-82.
  • 3何晓宇,李宏男.海洋平台确定多维地震动最不利输入方向的一种有效方法[J].振动与冲击,2007,26(12):49-54. 被引量:7
  • 4Penzien J. Characteristics of 3-dimensional earthquake ground motion[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Struc- tural Dynamics, 1975, 3(4): 365-373.
  • 5Wilson E L. Three-dimensional dynamic analysis for multi-component earthquake spectra[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1982, 10 (3) : 471-476.
  • 6Lopez O A, Torres R. The critical angle of seismic in- cidence and the maximum structural response [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1997, 26(9) : 881-894.
  • 7Menun C, Kiureghian A D. Replacement for the 30%, 40%,and SRSS rules for multi-component seismic a- nalysis[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 1998, 14(1): 153- 156.
  • 8Salazar A R, Barraza A L,Lopez A L. Multi-compo- nent seismic response analysis-a critical review [J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 2008, 12 ( 5 ) ; 779-799.
  • 9Nezamabadi M F, Moghadam A S, Hosseini M. The effect of vertical component of earthquake on seismic response of torsionally coupled systems [J]. Journal of Applied Science, 2008,8 (22) : 4029-4039.
  • 10全伟,李宏男.曲线桥多维地震时程分析主方向研究[J].振动与冲击,2008,27(8):20-24. 被引量:28

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部