期刊文献+

碳税、碳交易与行政命令减排——基于cournot模型的分析 被引量:6

Comparative analysis of Emission Taxes,Carbon Trading and Command and Control-Based on cournot model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 行政命令减排是中国传统的碳减排手段,碳税和碳交易是中国正在积极探索实践的两种市场化减排手段。在较长的一段时间内,这三种情形将可能并存。本文借鉴Sartzetakis的分析框架,用cournot模型将这三种减排手段统一起来并对其进行分析,比较了各种减排手段下的社会总产出、社会总福利、单个厂商的产出以及利润等。研究发现,碳交易在减排方面的作用要高于碳税。行政命令减排在很长的一段时期内仍将是减排的主要手段,如果使用得当,行政命令的效果也可能会优于碳税和碳交易。 Command and Control ( CAC ) by central government has been widely employed as one of the key measures of emission reduction in China. Additionally, the other two market - based measures, carbon tax and carbon trading, have emerged and been put to practice. These three measures are expected to coexist for a long time in the future. In this article9 following Sartzetakis ~ analytical framework 9 the authors employ the Cournot model to analyze systematically the three measures, and compare the total social output, social welfare, individual output and profit under each circumstance. Our analysis shows that: The effect of carbon trading in emission reduction is better than carbon tax. When certain conditions are met, the effect of CAC maybe prior to the other two.
作者 任志娟
出处 《贵州财经学院学报》 北大核心 2012年第6期1-7,共7页 Journal of Guizhou College of Finance and Economics
基金 国家社科基金重点项目"中国碳排放总量确定 指标分配 实现路径机制设计博弈分析及动态模拟研究"(10AJY002) 北京市哲学社会科学规划项目"目标管理模式下北京市实现碳强度目标的机制与路径研究"(11JGC127)
关键词 碳税 碳交易 行政命令减排 COURNOT模型 carbon tax carbon trading command and control cournot model
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1李萌,马兹晖,刘金贺,李牧群.低碳经济:中国亟需市场手段[J].当代经理人,2010(8):98-105. 被引量:2
  • 2Montgomery, D. Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control Programs[ J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 1972(5 ) :395 -418.
  • 3Stern, N. The Economics of Climate Change : The Stern Review[ M ]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 2007.
  • 4Aldy, J., A. Krupnick, R. Newell, I. Party and W. Pizer. Designing Climate Mitigation Policy[ R]. Rescourece for the Future, Discussion Pa- per,2009:8 - 16.
  • 5Pizer, W. Combining Price and Quantity Controls to Mitigate Global Climate Change[ J]. Journal of Public Economics, 2002 (85) :409 -434.
  • 6Hoel, M. and L. Karp . Taxes Versus Quotas for a Stock Pollutant[ J ]. Resource and Energy Economics,2002 (24) :367 -384.
  • 7Karp, L. and J. Zhang. Regulation of Stock Externalities with Correlated Abatement Costs [ J ]. Environmental and Resource Economics,2005 (32) :273 -300.
  • 8Murray, B. , R. Newell and W. Pizer. Balancing Cost and Emissions Certainty : An Allowance Reserve for Cap - and - Trade [ J 1. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 2009 ( 3 ) : 84 - 103.
  • 9Boehringer C., H. Koschel and U. Moslener. Efficiency Losses from Overlapping Regulation of EU Carbon Emissions [ J ]. Journal of Regulato- ry Economics ,2008 ( 33 ) : 299 - 317.
  • 10Barbara K. Buchne, Carlo Carraro and A. Denny Ellerman. The Allocaiton OF European Union allowances : lessons, unifying themes and general principles [ OL/EB ]. working paper, http ://www. bepress, com/feem/paperl08.

二级参考文献89

共引文献282

同被引文献49

  • 1Kossoy A, Ambrosi P. State and trends of the carbon market 2010[ R]. Carbon Finance at the World Bank, Washington. DC. May. 2010, www. carbonfinance, org.
  • 2Benz E, Truck S. CO2 emission allowances trading in Europe - Specifying a new class of assets [ J ]. Problems and Perspectives in Manage- ment, 2006,4 (3) :30 -40.
  • 3Benz E, Truck S. Modeling the price dynamics of CO2 emission allowances[ J ]. Energy Economics, 2009,31 (1) :4 - 15.
  • 4Serifert J, Homburg M U, Wagner M. Dynamic behavior of CO2 spot prices[ J]. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2008, 56(2) :180 - 194.
  • 5Johnson L L. The Theory of Hedging and Speculation in Commodity Futures[ J]. Review of Financial Studies, 1960, 27 (3) :139 - 151.
  • 6Lien D, TSE Y K. Fractional cointegration and futures hedging [ J ]. The Journal of Futures Markets, 1999, 19 (4) :457 -474.
  • 7Bolierslev T. Modelling the coherence in short -run nominal exchange rates: a multivariate generalized ARCH approach [ J]. Review of Eco- nomics and Statistics, 1990(72) :717 -729.
  • 8Kroner K F, Sultan J. Time - varying distribution dynamic hedging with foreign currency futures [ J ]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative A- nalysis, 1993,28(4) :535 -551.
  • 9Lien D,Tse Y K, Tsui A. Evaluating hedging performance of the constant - correlation GARCH Model[J]. Applied Financial Economics, 2002(12) :791 -798.
  • 10Lien D, Yang L. Asymmetric effect of basis on dynamic futures hedging: empirical evidence from commodity markets[ J]. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2008(32) :187 - 198.

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部