期刊文献+

句法和语义的互动关系的隐喻和转喻视角研究述评 被引量:12

Interaction between Syntax and Semantics:An Overview from a Cognitive Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 形态句法层面的隐喻和转喻研究为认知视角下的句法和语义互动研究注入了新的活力,语法意义隐喻和转喻视角转向拓宽了认知语法的视野。本文从介绍认知语法和生成语法对待句法和语义互动冲突的不同解决方案入手,回顾了语法意义的隐喻和转喻视角研究现状,认为语法隐喻和语法转喻并不是互动关系的两种单纯的唯一模式,隐喻和转喻互动的具体模式的确定是研究语法意义和隐喻/转喻互动关系的前提和难点。最后,本文尝试提出了语法意义和隐喻/转喻的互动模型以及隐喻和转喻的互动模型。但是,它们具体互动模式的确定还有待基于汉语语料的进一步研究。 Studies on metaphor and metonymy at the morphosyntactical level reenergize the study of the interaction between syntax and semantics from a perspective of cognition,and the turn to metaphoric and metonymic perspectives broadens the horizon of cognitive grammars.Comparing the cognitive solution with the generative solution to the conflict between syntax and semantics,this paper reviews the present metaphoric and metonymic studies of grammatical meaning,by pointing out that grammatical metaphor and grammatical metonymy are not the simple and sole interaction patterns,and concrete interaction modes between metaphor and metonymy are prerequisite and difficulty.Then,the paper proposes two interaction models,one between grammatical meaning and metaphor/metonymy and the other between metaphor and metonymy.Their specific interaction modes,however,are yet to be defined through Chinese corpus-based research in the future.
作者 张松松
出处 《外语研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期1-7,112,共7页 Foreign Languages Research
基金 江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金项目"句法和语义互动的隐喻和转喻视角"(项目编号:2012SJD740039) 江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目"句法和语义互动的隐喻和转喻视角"(项目编号:CXLX12_0374)的阶段性成果
关键词 认知动因 句法语义互动 语法隐喻 语法转喻 隐喻-转喻连续统 cognitive motivation bidirectional interaction grammatical metaphor grammatical metonymy metaphor-metonymy continuum
  • 相关文献

参考文献37

  • 1Baicchi, Annalisa. 2011. Metaphoric motivation in grammatical structures The caused-motion construction from the perspective of the Lexical-Constructional Modal [C] // K. -U. Panther & G. Radden. Motivation in Grammar and the Lexicon. Amsterdam & Philadelphia .. Benjamins: 149 - 169.
  • 2Barcelona, Antonio. 2000. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective [ M]. Berlin/New York.. Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 3Brdar, Mario. 2007. Metonymy in Grammar: Towards Motivating Extensions of Grammatical Categories and Constructions [M]. Osi]ek:Faeulty of Philosophy,Josip Juraj Strossmayer University.
  • 4Brdar, Mario & Rita Brdar-Szab6. 2009. The (non-) metonymic use of place names in English, German, Hungarian, and Croatian [C] ff K. -U. Panther,L. Thornburg & A. Barcelona. Metonymy and Metaphor in Grammar. Amsterdam Philadelphia: John Benjamins: 229 - 258.
  • 5Bergen, Benjamin K. & Nancy Chang. 2005. Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding [C] // J.-O. Ostman & M. Fried. Construction Grammars: Cognitive Grounding and Theoretical Extensions. Amsterdam.. John Benjamins: 147 -190.
  • 6Croft W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 7Croft,William & Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics [M]. New York: CUP.
  • 8Dirven,Rene & Ralf P6rings. 2002. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast [M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 9Evans, V. 2006, Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning-construction [J]. Cognitive Linguistics 17 (4) :491 - 534.
  • 10Evans,V., B. Bergen & J. Zinken. 2007. The Cognitive Linguistics Reader [M]. London: Equinox.

二级参考文献65

共引文献86

同被引文献172

引证文献12

二级引证文献78

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部