支气管哮喘不同治疗方案临床观察

Clinical observation of different on neonatal childhood asthma

目的:观察及评估儿童哮喘不同治疗方案的临床疗效。方法:将92例哮喘患儿随机分为3个不同治疗方案组,Ⅰ组(对照组):支持治疗;Ⅱ组:支持治疗+布地奈德+爱全乐;Ⅲ组:支持治疗+布地奈德+爱全乐+万托林;比较3组平均住院天数、治愈率、好转率及无效率。结果:Ⅱ组及Ⅲ组与Ⅰ组比较,平均住院天数、治愈率、好转率、无效率均有显著差异;Ⅱ组与Ⅲ组之间比较无统计学差异。结论:综合治疗哮喘患儿对减轻临床症状,缩短疗程,有积极促进作用。布地奈德及爱全乐能够显著提高哮喘治疗效果。

Objective To observe and evaluate the effect of different Treatment Protocols for childhood asthma. Methods 92 patients with bronchial asthma were randomly divided into three groups： group I （the control group）： given conventional therapy; group II ： conventional therapy＋ Budesonide＋ atrovent; group Ul ： conventional therapy＋ Budesonide＋ atrovent＋ ventolin.The length of stay, re- covery rate, improvement rate and inefficiency were to be compared among the three groups.Results compared with group I , group II and group III had statistically significant differences in the length of stay, recovery rate, improvement rate and inefficiency.And the differences between group II and group III were not statistically significant.Conclusion Comprehensive treatment on childhood asth- ma has active promoting effect on alleviating clinical symptoms shortening treatment course and reducing Budesonide and atrovent had therapeutic effect for childhood asthma,