期刊文献+

迪昂主题的四个变奏 被引量:2

Variations on a Theme by Duhem
下载PDF
导出
摘要 迪昂主题讨论的是抽象的法式思维和具象的英式思维之间的鲜明对比,本文则主要探讨迪昂主题的四个变奏。第一变奏阐明了抽象方法与具体方法在方法及结果上的实质区别。第二变奏对卡伦德-科恩提出的科学表征的紧缩主义进行了批判性的讨论。第三变奏从认识论结构主义角度探讨了模型与结构之间的关系。第四变奏联系抽象模型和具体模型的区分,批判性地讨论了模型与虚构的关系。文章最后给出了作者本人对具体模型之本质的看法,并阐明了为什么只有具体模型才能被视为是完全虚构的。 This paper contains four variations on Duhem's theme about the contrast between the abstract French mind and the concrete British mind. The first variation brings out the real contrast between two types of methods and their results: the A(bstract) method or models and the C(oncrete) method or models. The second variation gives a critical discussion of the Callender-Cohen deflationary contruel of scientific representation. And the third and fourth variations critically discuss the relationship between models and fiction in connection to the distinction between the A-models and the C-models. A coda maps out (without sufficiently detailed arguments) the author's view on the nature of the C-models and why they, and only they, can be viewed as fully fictional
作者 刘闯
出处 《科学文化评论》 2012年第5期5-32,共28页 Science & Culture Review
关键词 迪昂主题 科学表征 心灵 模型 虚构 紧缩主义结 构主义 Duhem's theme scientific representation mind model fiction deflationism structuralism
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Bokulich, A. 2004. Open or Closed Dirac, Heisenberg, and the Relation between Classical and Quantum Mechanics.Studies in History and Philosophy of Modem Physics. 35:377 - 396.
  • 2Burgess, A. and Burgess, J. P. 2011. Truth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • 3Callender, C. and Cohen, J. 2006. There Is No Special Problem About Scientific Representation. Theoria. 55:7 - 25.
  • 4Daitz, E. 1956. The Picture Theory of Meaning. A. Flew ed. Essays in Conceptual Analysis. London: MacMillan. 53 - 74.
  • 5Demopoulos, W. and Friedman, M. 1989. The Concept of Structure in The Analysis of Matter. Savage C. W. & Anderson, C. A. eds. Rereading Russell [Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy ofScience Ⅻ]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 183 - 199.
  • 6Demopoulos, W. 2003a. Russell' s Structuralism and the Absolute Description of the World. Griffin, N. ed. The Cambridge Companion to Bertrand Russell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 392 - 419.
  • 7Demopoulos, W. 2003b. On the Rational Reconstruction of our Theoretical Knowledge. Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 54:371 - 403.
  • 8Duhem, E 1954. TheAirn and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • 9Freeman, W. J. 1991. The Physiology of Perception. Scientific American. 264 (2): 78 - 85.
  • 10French, S. 1989. Identity and Individuality in Quantum Theory. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qt-idind/.

同被引文献24

  • 1郝刘祥,王扬宗.科学传统与中国科学事业的现代化[J].科学文化评论,2004,1(1):18-34. 被引量:11
  • 2罗吉尔·斯佩里,张明悟.寻求与科学相容的生活信仰[J].科学文化评论,2004,1(3):99-113. 被引量:4
  • 3默顿.2003.科学的规范结构.载《科学社会学》上册.柳旭东、林聚任译.北京:商务印书馆页361-376.
  • 4科瓦雷2002.伽利略与柏拉图.郝刘祥译.载:《中国科学与科学革命》.刘钝、王扬宗主编.沈阳:辽宁教育出版社.页810-834.
  • 5罗尔斯.《正义论》,北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988年,第75页.
  • 6托克维尔.《旧制度与大革命》,冯棠译,北京:商务印书馆,1992年,第220页.
  • 7Ben-David J. 1971. The Scientist's Role in Society. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • 8博兰尼.2002.《自由的逻辑》.冯银江、李雪茹译.长春:吉林人民出版社.
  • 9布什.2004.《科学-没有止境的前沿》.范岱年等译.北京:商务印书馆.
  • 10Butterfield H. 1958. Origins of Modern Science. London: G. Bell & Sons Ltd.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部