期刊文献+

熟悉主题说明文阅读推理加工的认知神经机制 被引量:3

Brain Activations of the Inference Processing in Familiar Topics Expository Text Comprehension
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用功能磁共振成像(Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging,fMRI)技术对熟悉主题说明文阅读过程因果推理加工进行研究,探讨说明文阅读过程中读者是否能够自发进行因果推理加工,以及阅读焦点的存在是否会对说明文阅读过程中的因果推理加工产生影响。结果表明,读者在熟悉主题说明文阅读过程中能够自动进行推理加工,负责推理加工的主要脑区为额叶(尤其是额下回)、顶叶下部及双侧楔前叶等区域。在熟悉主题说明文阅读过程中,阅读焦点的存在一定程度上使读者的认知加工资源集中在对与焦点相关的推理关系的加工上。 Inference was a tool to establish coherence of the text and provided necessary insurance for correct comprehension. The study of inference in discourse comprehension using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was a rather recent, but exciting development research area. The existing fMRI researches of inference in discourse comprehension nearly all based on narrative, studies which based on expository hadn't been reported yet. Now, researchers had a clear consensus that inference was coded automatically on-line during narrative reading. Expository is another important literary form, inference in expository comprehension has been extensively investigated in behavioral paradigms, but it was somewhat surprising that there still great debated about if local coherence could be coded automatically during expository reading or not. And till now, the definitely and consistently explanation has not been coincided yet. Meanwhile, it was less known about the neural substrates of inference process in expository comprehension. In this study, brain activations of inference processing in familiar topics expository text comprehension were measured using fMRI, which aimed to investigate whether readers could drawn inference automatically during expository reading and pointed out the core brain area of inference processing in expository reading. Meanwhile, Mo had pointed out that when there existed reading focus in text, readers will make inference around the focus on their own initiative. So another aim of this test was to make sure whether focus-based reading will influence the inference process of expository reading. Participants were asked to read 80 passages which include five or six sentences that differed whether or not an inference needed to be drawn to understand them. Each sentence was present for 3 seconds. Half of the passages were focus-based, and half were not. The questions were about the text but not concerned with the inference. There whole test was divided into 5 runs and there were 16 trials in each run. Participants had to finish a probe task after reading each passage. There were two pre-experiments which were used to choose test materials and decide reading time for each sentence. The MRI signals were obtained when participants read the expository texts. The target sentence was the last sentence of the passage but not the question sentence. The scanner was a 3.0 T Siemens Magnetom Vision MRI scanner. The stimuli were presented with black characters on a gray background through the projector on the mirror. The functional MRI data from 22 participants were analyzed with SPM8. The general inference related activation appeared in frontal cortex (which included inferior frontal gyrus, superior frontal gyrus and middle frontal gyrus), inferior parietal gyrus and precuneus bilaterally in expository text reading. These areas were main areas which related to the inference process in expository comprehension. In the condition of focus-based reading, the cortical related activation appeared more concentrate on frontal gyrus bilaterally, especially the IFG. The present findings indicated that the basic brain areas about inference in expository reading were generally consistent with which researchers had found in narrative before. The focus-based reading helped readers to pay attention on inference processes, other processes which were not concerned with inference were restrained. This result supported the bi-processing theory of text comprehension.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第11期1443-1453,共11页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(2012CB720700) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30870783)
关键词 说明文 推理加工 焦点阅读 FMRI expository inference focus-based reading fMRI
  • 相关文献

参考文献27

  • 1Badre, D. (2008). Cognitive control, hierarchy, and the rostro-caudal organization of the frontal lobes. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(5), 193-200.
  • 2Beeman, M. (2005). Bilateral brain processes for comprehending natural language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9(11), 512-518.
  • 3Binder, J. R., Westbury, C. F., Mckiernan, K. A., Possing, E. T., & Medler, D. A. (2005). Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(1), 905-917.
  • 4Doumas, L. A. A., Hummel, J. E., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2008). A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts. Psychological Review, 115(1), 1-43.
  • 5Estevez, A., & Calvo, M. (2000). Working memory capacity and time course of predictive inferences. Memory, 8(1), 51-61.
  • 6Ferstl, E. C. (2010). Neuroimaging of text comprehension: Where are we now? Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 61-88.
  • 7Ferstl, E. C., Neumann, J., Bogler, C. D., & Cramon, V. Y. (2008). The extended language network: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on text comprehension. Human Brain Mapping, 29, 581-593.
  • 8Ferstl, E. C., & VoncrAmon, D. Y. (2001). The role of coherence and cohesion in text comprehension: An event-related fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 11, 325-340.
  • 9Fiese, U., Roland R., Markus, R., & Franz, S. (2008). Neural indicators of inference processes in text comprehension: An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 2110-2124.
  • 10Jennifer, W., & Myers, J. L. (2003). Availability and accessibility of information and causal inferences from scientific text. Discourse Processes, 36, 109-129.

二级参考文献55

共引文献15

同被引文献43

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部