期刊文献+

中澳数学课程标准内容深度比较——基于初中学段“统计与概率”的分析 被引量:8

Comparison of Content Depth of Mathematics Curriculum Standards in China and Australia: An Analysis Based on the "Statistics and Probability" in the Stage of Junior Secondary School
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对我国2011年颁布的《义务教育数学课程标准(2011年版)》与澳大利亚2010年颁布的《澳大利亚数学课程》中初中学段"统计与概率"领域内容的深度进行质性分析与量化比较后发现:澳大利亚"统计与概率"领域内容深度略大于中国,但差异不显著。在内容分布上的差异是,中国以"数据收集、整理与描述"和"数据分析"为重,而澳大利亚初中学段"统计与概率"四个模块水平要求相对均衡;在认知水平分布上的差异是,中国以"理解"和"掌握"为重,而澳大利亚以"理解"和"问题解决"为重。借鉴《澳大利亚数学课程》,我国需要强化"统计与概率"课程内容的严谨性与实践性,加强与现代信息技术的整合,以及发展学生的批判性与创造性思维等。 Based on “The Mathematics Curriculum Standards of Compulsory Education (Version 2011)” issued in China in 2011 and “The Australian Curriculum: Mathematics” issued in Australia in 2010, the authors conducted qualitative analysis and quantitative comparison on the depth of “Statistics and Probability” in the two mathematics curriculum standards in the stage of the junior secondary school. The results show that the depth of “Statistics and Probability” in Australian curriculum standards is slightly deeper than that of China, but the difference is insignificant. The difference in content distribution is that China pays more attention to “data collection, organizing and description” and “data analysis”; while Aus tralia is trying to balance the requirements of four modules of “Statistics and Probability”. The difference in the distribution of cognitive level is that China takes “understanding” and “grasping” as the most important; while Australia pays more attention to “understanding” and “problem solving”. We should learn from “The Australian Curriculum: Mathematics” to increase the rigor and practicality of the curriculum content, strengthen the integration of curriculum and information technology, and develop students' criti cal and creative thinking.
出处 《教育学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期29-36,共8页 Journal of Educational Studies
基金 2010年教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"多元文化数学课程的理论与实践研究"(项目编号:10YJA880179)阶段性研究成果
关键词 数学课程 课程标准 统计与概率 课程深度 mathematics curriculum curriculum standards statistics and probability depth of curriculum
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1中华人民共和国教育部.基础教育课程改革纲要(试行)[Z].,2001..
  • 2ACARA.The Australian Curriculum,Mathematics[EB/OL]. (2012-04-16) [2012-04-16].
  • 3中华人民共和国教育部.义务教育数学课程标准(2011年版)[S].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2011.
  • 4Norman L. Webb. Alignment of science and Mathematics Standards and Assessments in 亡our States[A]. National Institu-te for Science Education University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1999.
  • 5Andrew C. Porter. Measuring the Content of Instruction; Uses in Research and Practice. Educational Researcher[J]. 2002,3K7):3~14.
  • 6史宁中,孔凡哲,李淑文.课程难度模型:我国义务教育几何课程难度的对比[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(6):151-155. 被引量:169
  • 7黄荣金.国际数学课堂的录像研究及其思考[J].比较教育研究,2004,25(3):39-43. 被引量:16

二级参考文献17

  • 1黄甫全.关于课程难度阶梯的初步探讨[J].华南师范大学学报(社会科学版),1995(2):104-108. 被引量:10
  • 2黄甫全,王晶.课程难度刍论[J].东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版),1994(4):91-96. 被引量:44
  • 3李士锜.熟能生巧吗[J].数学教育学报,1996,(3).
  • 4Stigler J W, Gonzales P, Kawanaka T, Knoll S, and Serrano A. (1999) . The TIMSS Videotape Classroom Study: Methods and Findings From an Exploratory Research Project on Eighth- Grade Mathematics Instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. (NCES 1999 -074).U S Department of Education. Washington, DC" National Center for Education Statistics.
  • 5Stigler J W and Hiebert J. (1999) . The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas From the World' s Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom. New York: Free Press.
  • 6Hiebert J, Gallimore R, Gamier H, Giwin K B,Hollingsworth H, Jacobs J, Chiu A M -Y, Wearne D, Smith M, Kersting N, Manaster A, Tseng E ,Etterbeek W, Manaster C, Gonzales P, and Stigler J. (2003) . Teaching Mathematics in Seven Countries:Results From the TIMSS 1999 Video Study (NCES 2003 -013) . U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC:National Center for Education Statistics.
  • 7Lewis C, & Tsuchida I. (1998). A Lesson is Like a Swiftly Flowing River: Research Lessons and the Improvement of Japanese Education. American Educator, Winter,14-17&50-52.
  • 8Paine L. (2002, April) . Learning to Teach Through Joining a Community of Practice in Shanghai: Curriculum Control and Public Scrutiny of Teaching as Context for Teacher Learning. Paper Presented at the American Education Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, USA.
  • 9Paine L W. (1992) . Teaching and Modernization in Contemporary China. In R Hayhoe(Ed. ), Education and Modernization: The Chinese Experience (pp 183 -210) .England: Pergamon Press.
  • 10Stigler, J. W., Gonzales, P., Kawanaka, T., Knoll, S., and Serrano, A. (1999) . The TIMSS Videotape Classroom Study: Methods and Findings From an Exploratory Research Project on Eighth- Grade Mathematics Instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United State

共引文献231

同被引文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部