期刊文献+

究竟是“热手效应”还是“赌徒谬误”主导着市场情绪?——来自中国股票市场的证据 被引量:6

Is the Market Sentiment Dominated by Hot Hand or Gambler's Fallacy? Evidence from Chinese Stock Market
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文的研究焦点是中国股票市场中的"热手效应"或"赌徒谬误"认知偏差。通过定义情绪指数和界定系统性的"热手效应"或"赌徒谬误"认知偏差,本文首先基于日的时间尺度、整体投资者的合力情绪及包括不同市场阶段的较长时期对这两种偏差进行统计检验,然后分别从不同的时间尺度(周)、不同的投资者类型(散户、大户和咨询机构)、不同的市场阶段(牛市和熊市)以及游程反转后的市场累积收益等视角对"热手效应"或"赌徒谬误"偏差进行了一系列的稳健性检验。检验结果表明,一般来讲,"热手效应"主导着市场情绪。 This study focuses on two types of cognitive biases: hot hand and gambler's fallacy in Chinese stock market. At first, by defining the sentiment index and what systematic hot hand and gambler's fallacy are, we conduct statistical tests on hot hand and gambler's fallacy with regard to daily data, resultant sentiment of the whole investors and relatively long period including various market stages. And then we conduct a series of robust tests on hot hand and gambler's fallacy with regard to weekly data, such three types of investors as retail investors, institutional investors and enquiry agencies, such two market stages as bullish market and bearish market and cumulative market return after the reverse of a run. The results indicate that generally speaking, hot hand dominates the market sentiment.
出处 《管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第10期26-37,共12页 Management Review
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71171133) 上海市教育委员会科研创新项目(10YZ184) 上海市教育委员会重点学科建设项目(J51601)
关键词 代表性启发式偏差 热手效应 赌徒谬误 市场情绪 过度反应 representative heuristic biases, hot hand, gambler's fallacy, market sentiment, overreaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Fiske, S. T., Taylor, S. E. Social Cognition (2nd Ed.)[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991.
  • 2Rabin, M. Inference by Believers in the Law of Small Numbers[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2002,117(3):817-869.
  • 3Grether, D. M. Bayes Rule as a Descriptive Model: The Representativeness Heuristic[J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1980, 95(3):537-557.
  • 4Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., Tversky, A. The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences[J]. Cognitive Psy- chology, 1985,17(3):295-314.
  • 5De Bondt, W. F. M. A Portrait of the Individual Investor[J]. European Economic Review, 1998,42(3-5):831-844.
  • 6Johnson, J., Tellis, G. J. Blowing Bubbles: Heuristics and Biases in the Run-up of Stock Prices[J]. Journal of the Academy of Mar- keting Science, 2005,33(4):486-503.
  • 7林树,俞乔,汤震宇,周建,子璇(校对).投资者“热手效应”与“赌徒谬误”的心理实验研究[J].经济研究,2006,41(8):58-69. 被引量:38
  • 8De Bondt, W. F. M., Thaler, R. H. Dose the Stock Market Overreact?[J]. Journal of Finance, 1985,40(3):793-805.

二级参考文献20

  • 1陈昌华.中国股市“边缘化”了吗?[J].财经,2005,0(4):54-54. 被引量:1
  • 2周明剑.市场不能太伤投资者的心——中国证券市场投资者与从业人员调查[J].中国发展观察,2005(3):40-41. 被引量:1
  • 3孙兆斌,黄惠春.“股市困境”与中国股票市场发展[J].广东金融学院学报,2005,20(4):22-27. 被引量:4
  • 4A. Peter and F. Ilan,2004, "The Hot Hand Fallacy and the Gambler's Fallacy: Two Faces of Subjective Randomness?" Memory & Cognition,32,1369-1378.
  • 5Camerer, C. F. 1989, "An Experiment Test of Several Generalized Utility Theories", Journal of Risk and Uncertainty ,2,61-104.
  • 6De Bondt, W. F. M., 1991, "What Do Economists Know about the Stock Market?" Journal of Portfolio Management 17,84-91.
  • 7Gilovich,T., Vallone, R. and Tversky, A. 1985, "The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences", Cognitive Psychology, 17,295-314.
  • 8Joseph, J. ,2001,"Losers, Winners and Hype Consumer Choice of Stocks Under Uncertainty", Ph. D. Dissertation, Graduate School, University of Southern California.
  • 9Jegadeesh,N.and Titman,S., 1993, "Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency", Journal of Finance,48,65-91.
  • 10J. Lakonishok, A. Shleifer and R. W. Vishny, 1994,"Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk", Journal of Finance,49,1541-1578.

共引文献37

同被引文献88

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部