经传一体还是经传分立?——《太玄》仿《易》的经传问题

Separating Commentaries from Classics: the Interpretation of Tai xuan on Yi

《汉书·扬雄传》中"经莫大于《易》,故作《太玄》"的说法导引了后人"以《易》求《玄》"的研究思路,以此得出扬雄仿照《易》经、传一一而作《太玄》经、传的偏失结论。分析扬雄作《太玄》时《易》的实际情况,就会发现扬雄的解《易》理路是"《玄传》-《玄经》-《易经》",《太玄》是经、传分立的。扬雄采用"经自经、传自传"的方式释《易》,在于倡导"简而要"地追寻经典本义,对东汉古文经学产生了一定影响。

＂YANG Xiong described Xuan same as Yi＂ of BAN Gu leaded to the research way of ＂interpreted Xuan through Yi＂, which resulted in biased point of view on YANG Xiong described classics and commentaries of Xuan same as Yi＇s one by one. If we analysis the aelual situation on Yi when YANG Xiong wrote Tai xuan, we find Tai xuan separated commentaries from classics and YANG Xiong interpreted Yi by ＂from Xuan zhuan to Xuan jing to Yi zhuann. YANG Xiong proposed the concise and to the point way for finding meanings of original classics in this way, which influenced old - text classics of the Eastern Han Dynasty.