期刊文献+

浮膝损伤Fraser分型的改良:附28例临床报告 被引量:3

The self-modified Fraser's classification for floating knees used in clinic
原文传递
导出
摘要 【摘要】目的设计一种浮膝损伤的改良Fraser分型并探讨其临床意义。方法2006年1月至2009年12月共收治且获得完整随访的28例浮膝损伤患者,男2l例,女7例;年龄18-87岁,平均43岁。将浮膝损伤按改良Fraser分型分为3型:I型,关节外骨折;Ⅱ副,骨折累及股骨远端和(或)胫骨近端关节而;Ⅲ型,合并髌骨骨折。Ⅱ型和Ⅲ型又各自分为2个亚型:ⅡA型,关节内简单骨折;ⅡB型.关节内复杂骨折;ⅢA型,髌骨简单骨折;ⅢB型,髌骨粉碎性骨折。本组I型11例,ⅡA型2例,ⅡB型8例,ⅢA型2例,ⅢB型5例。受伤至内固定于术时问平均为9d(0-17d)。l例患者在受伤当天接受手术治疗;12例患者采用外固定支架临时固定,15例患者采用石膏托或牵引固定,最终行钢板或髓内钉固定。,未次随访时根据Kalstrom和Olerud标准评定疗效。结果28例患者术后获平均29个月(12-60个月)随访。末次随访时根据Kalstrom和Olerud标准评定疗效:优7例,良13例,可5例,差3例,优良率为71.4%。11例I型患昔:优6例,良4例,可1例;2例ⅡA型患者均为良;8例HB型患背:优I例,良4例,可2例,差1例;2例ⅢA型患者:良1例,可1例;5例ⅢB型患者:良2例,可l例,差2例。7例患者术后出现并发症:感染3例,膝关节不稳2例,膝关节僵硬2例。结论改良Fraser分型有助于外科医牛比较浮膝损伤的治疗结果并判断预后。根据改良Fraser分型,ⅡA型与I型损伤患者效果相当,ⅡB型和Ⅲ型损伤患者预后较差。 Objective To report a self-modified Fraser's classification fror floating knees and its clinical significance. Methods Between January 2006 and December 2009, 28 patients floating knee were treated and followed fully by our department. They were 21 nleu and 7 women. Their mean age was 43 years (range, 18 to 87 years) . Our self-nlodified Fraser's classifieation divides floating knees into 3 types: type I, extra-articular fractures; type li, fractures involving the articular facet of distal femur and/or proxi- mal tibia; type Ⅲ, fractures combined with patellar fracture. There were 2 sub-types in both type li and type Ⅲ: type liA, simple intra-articular fractures; type liB, eomplex intra-articular fractures; type IliA, simple patellar fractures; type Ⅲ B. eomminuted patellar fractures. In this series, 11 cases were type l, 2 type liA, 8 type ⅡB, 2 type ⅢA and 5 type Ⅲ B. The time from injury" to definitive fixation averaged 9 days (range, 0 to 17 days) . Twelve cases used an external fixator and 15 used a plaster slab or traction for temporary sta- bilization; definitive fixation was performed using either nailing or plating. Functional outcomes were assessed according to criteria by Kalstrom and Olerud. Results The patients were follnwed for a mean of 29 months (range, 12 to 60 months) . By the Kalstrmn & Olerud criteria, the funetional outcomes at the last follow-up were excellent in 7 patients, good in 13, fair in 5 and poor in 3, giving an excellent to good rate of 71.4%. Of the 11 cases of type I, 6 were excellent, 4 good and one fair. The 2 type liA cases were all good. Of the 8 cases of type liB, one was excellent, 4 were good, 2 fair and one poor. The 2 type mA cases got one good and one fair result. Of the 5 cases of type m B, 2 were good, one was fair and 2 were poor. Infection occurred in 3 cases, knee instability and knee stiffness were found in 2 cases each. Conclusion Our self-modified Fraser's classification may provide a more reliable basis for a surgeon to compare treatment results and assess prognosis. According to the modified classification, type ⅡA and type Ⅰ injuries can have comparable outcomes while Type ⅡB and type Ⅲ injuries may have poorer prognosis.
出处 《中华创伤骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第11期923-926,共4页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
关键词 膝损伤 股骨骨折 胫骨骨折 治疗结果 分型 Knee injuries Femoral fractures Tibial fractures Treatmen| outcome Classi- fication
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Rios JA, Ho-Fung V, Ramirez N, et al. Floating knee injuries treated with single-incision technique versus traditional antegrade femur fixa- tion: a comparative study. Am J Orthop, 2004, 33: 468-472.
  • 2Yokoyama K, Tsukamoto T, Aoki S, et al. Evaluation of functional outcome of the floating knee injury using multivariate analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2002, 122: 432-435.
  • 3Ostrum RF. Treatment of floating knee injuries through a single per- cutaneous approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2000(375): 43-50.
  • 4Blake R, McBryde A Jr. The floating knee: ipsilateral fractures of the tibia and femur. South Med J, 1975, 68: 13-16.
  • 5Fraser RD, Hunter GA, Waddell JP. Ipsilateral fracture of the femur and tibia. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1978, 60: 510-515.
  • 6Chalidis B, Metha SS, Tsiridis E, et al. The "floating knee" in adults and children. Curr Orthop, 2006, 20: 405-410.
  • 7曾炳芳.骨干骨折治疗理念与技术的演变[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2008,10(1):3-6. 被引量:20
  • 8Canale ST, Beaty JH. Campbell's operative orthopaedics, llth ed. St. Louis: The C. V. Mosby Company, 2007.

二级参考文献20

共引文献19

同被引文献15

  • 1刘国辉,杨述华,杜靖远,郑启新,邵增务.老年浮膝损伤治疗的回顾分析[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2004,12(16):1217-1219. 被引量:6
  • 2廖文杰,何春雷,黄希勤,杨平,高文波,陈伟兵,饶勇辉.创伤性浮膝损伤的手术治疗[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(12):1193-1194. 被引量:9
  • 3万春友,金鸿宾.创伤性“浮膝”损伤78例回顾与分析[J].中华骨科杂志,1997,17(6):357-360. 被引量:72
  • 4张英泽.股骨骨折[M]//张英泽.临床创伤骨折流行病学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009: 155-196.
  • 5Zhang YZ. Femoral fractures[M]//Zhang YZ. Clinical epidemiologyof orthopedic trauma. New York: Thieme, 2012: 158-218.
  • 6Blake R,McBryde AJr. The floating knee: ipsilateral fractures ofthe tibia and femur[ J]. South Med J, 1975,68( 1 ) : 13-16.
  • 7Fraser RD, Hunter GA, Waddell JP. Ipsilateral fracture of thefemur and tibia[ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg, 1978,60-B(4) : 510-515.
  • 8Rethnam U, Yesupalan RS, Nair R. The floating knee: epidemiology,prognostic indicators & outcome following surgical management[J] . J Trauma Manag Outcomes,2007,1(1); 2.
  • 9Winquist RA. Ragmental fracture of the lower extremity and thefloating knee [ M ] // Meyers MH. The multiply injured patientwith complex fractures. Philadelphia : Lea and Febiger, 1984 :218-248.
  • 10Veith RG, Winquist RA, Hanse ST Jr. Ipsilateral fractures ofthefemur and tibia: A report of fifty-seven consecutive cases[ J]. JBone Joint Surg Am, 1984,66(7) : 991-1002.

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部