摘要
对分别安装了金属火炉和非金属火炉的2座气流上升式密集烤房的烘烤效应进行了比较研究。结果表明,1座非金属火炉比1座金属火炉节省建造费用1240元,降低成本60.5%;非金属火炉烤房单位干烟叶耗煤量(1.71 kg/kg)高于金属火炉烤房(1.60 kg/kg)6.88%;2个处理烤后烟叶的等级结构和主要化学成分含量均没有明显差异;非金属火炉烟囱表面温度高于金属火炉烟囱表面温度0.3~11.3℃。因此,非金属火炉的建造成本大大低于金属火炉;金属火炉的烘烤成本明显低于非金属火炉;火炉类型对烤后烟叶质量没有明显影响。
The curing effect was compared between two up-draft bulk curing barns which were installed metallic stove or nonmetallic stove.The result showed that the construction cost of nonmetallic stove was lower(60.5 percent) than that of metallic stove,and that the reduced cost was 1240 yuan.The coal consumption was 1.71 kg to attain 1 kg dried tobacco leaves in bulk curing barn installed nonmetallic stove,and that the coal consumption was higher(6.88 percent) than that in bulk curing barn installed metallic stove which consumed 1.6 kg coal to attain 1kg dried tobacco leaves.The grade structure and primary chemical composition contents had no significant difference between two different types bulk curing barns.Surface temperature of nonmetallic stove was higher(0.3-11.3℃) than that of metallic stove.These results further suggested that the construction cost of metallic stove was significantly higher than that of metallic stove.But the curing cost of metallic stove was significantly lower than that of nonmetallic stove.The type of stove had no significant influence on the quality of dried tobacco leaves.
出处
《西南农业学报》
CSCD
北大核心
2012年第5期1895-1899,共5页
Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences
基金
贵州省烟草专卖局(公司)(中烟黔科〔2009〕号)
"日光温室型太阳能密集烤房的研制及应用研究"(2009-05)
关键词
金属火炉
非金属火炉
密集烤房
烘烤效应
Metallic stove
Nonmetallic stove
Bulk curing barn
Curing effect