期刊文献+

碳酸氢钠溶液在预防鼻肠管堵塞中的效果观察 被引量:10

Effect Observation of Sodium Bicarbonate Solution in Preventing Nasal Intestinal Tube Obstruction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探索留置鼻肠管进行肠内营养的病人发生鼻肠管堵塞预防办法。方法:对行肠内营养的病人进行冲洗鼻肠管发现有阻力时,试验组病人来用5%碳酸氢钠溶液10 mL进行脉冲式冲管,闭管30 min;对照组病人采用生理盐水20 mL进行脉冲式冲管,闭管30 min,观察两组的效果结果:试验组鼻肠管通畅的病人多于对照组,两组比较,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:5%碳酸氢钠溶液10 mL脉冲式冲洗鼻肠管后闭管30 min是解除鼻肠管堵塞的有效方法。 Objective: To effectively prevent nasal intestinal tube obstruction occurring in indwelling nasal intesti- nal tube for patients accepting enteral nutrition. Method : In experimental group, in the case of resistance, pulsed type with 5% sodium bicarbonate solution 10 mL was applied to flush nasal intestinal tube, then closed tube for 30 minutes ; The control group was treated by pulsed type with physiological saline 20 mL, then closed tube for 30 minutes. Result: The cases of nasalt tube to be unobstructed in experimental group were more than those in control group with X2 test. There was statistical significance (P 〈0.05). Conclusion: 5% sodium bicarbonate solution 10 mL in pulsed type is a- dopted to flush nasal intestinal tube, then closed tube for 30 minutes, which proves to be an effective method to solve enteral obstruction.
机构地区 山西大医院
出处 《山西职工医学院学报》 CAS 2012年第5期58-59,共2页 Journal of Shanxi Medical College for Continuing Education
关键词 5%碳酸氢钠溶液 鼻肠管 堵塞 冲洗 5% sodium bicarbonate solution nasal intestinal tube obstruction flush
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献58

共引文献117

同被引文献96

  • 1全华斌,彭侠彪,陈海英.危重患者经鼻空肠双腔管和经胃管营养的临床比较[J].中华消化杂志,2005,25(9):568-569. 被引量:8
  • 2李瑞红,李德春.鼻空肠管与鼻胃管在危重患者早期肠内营养的应用比较[J].中国医师进修杂志(外科版),2006,29(5):48-49. 被引量:37
  • 3程艳爽,王建荣,马燕兰,王兰英.不同鼻饲体位与方式食管pH监测结果的变化[J].现代护理(上旬版),2007,13(1):10-12. 被引量:13
  • 4倪元红,叶向红,高勇,彭南海.短肠综合征患者营养康复治疗的观察和护理[J].医学研究生学报,2007,20(6):593-596. 被引量:25
  • 5Onur O E, Onur E, Guneysel O, et al,Endoscopic ggstrostomy, nasojejunal and oral feeding comparison in aspiration pnelmoia patients[J].J RBs Med Sei. 2013. 11 ( 12) : 1097-1102,.
  • 6Baeten C, Hoefnagels J. Feeding viet rlasogstrie tube or pereutaneous endoBeopie gastrostomy.a comparison[J],fiend J Gastroeoterol Suppl, 1992, 194 ( 25 ) : 95 - 98.
  • 7Braunscheig C L, Levy p, Sheean P M, et al,Ettteral compared with parenteral nutrition.a meta-analyaia[J],hm J Clio Nutr. 2001,74( 34 ); 531-542.
  • 8Jung S H, Dong S H, Lee J Y, et al.Pereutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy prevents gastroe~ophageal reflux in patients with nasogastrie tube feeding, a prospective study with 24-hour pH monitoring[J].Gut Liver, 2011, 5 ( 12 ) : 288~292,.
  • 9Gomes G F, Pisani J C, Maeedo E D, et al.The nasogastric feeding tube as a risk factor for aspiration and aspiration pneumonia[J]. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care, 2003, 6 ( 3 ) : 327-333.
  • 10Sriram K, Jayarthi V, Lakshmi R G, et al. Prophylatic Lock- ing of En-teral Feeding Tubes with Pancreatic Enzymes[ J ]. JPEN,1997,21 (2):353-356.

引证文献10

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部