作而非述——从《太上感应篇注》看惠栋的学术取向

A Producer Rather Than an Expositor —— Hui Dong's Academic Features from Commentary to Taishan Ganying Pian ZHU Xinwu

关于清代汉学吴派鼻祖惠栋的学术取向的论断,以梁启超"述而不作"的观点最为学界所接受。不过,清代汉学家远不止具有考据的层面,对义理和经世的重视则是考据之外的另一种面相。这既是近年来学界清代学术和思想史的重要发现,也是重新思考惠栋学术取向的出发点。通过对《太上感应篇注》的创作缘起、引文和内容的分析及其影响的讨论,可以看到惠栋的另一种学术取向。这种学术取向与其说是"述而不作",毋宁说是"作而非述"。正是在这个意义上,可以丰富我们对惠栋和清代学术与思想史的认识。

As to the academic features of Hui Dong（1697—1758）,the pioneering scholar of the Wu School studying the Han scholars in the Qing Dynasty,Liang Qichao＇s point of view that Hui Dong was an expositor rather than a producer was generally accepted.However,the scholars who studied the Han scholars in the Qing Dynasty were far from textual level.They not only attached importance to textual research,but also attached importance to their ＂universal truths＂ and ＂ways to govern＂.This is the starting point to reflect on Hui Dong＇s academic features as well as a great discovery in the study of the academic history and intellectual history of the Qing Dynasty.By analyzing and discussing Hui Dong＇s Commentary to Taishan Ganyin Pian,this paper has discovered another academic feature of Hui Dong＇s work.In other words,the authors maintains that Hui is a producer rather than an expositor instead of the other way round.It is in this sense that we can further enrich the understanding of the academic and intellectual history of the Qing Dynasty.