汉语关系结构接应代词的句法被引量：4

The syntax of resumptive pronouns in Chinese relative structures

导出

摘要文献将接应代词分为三类:移位生成的接应代词(如Vata语疑问句中的接应代词)、基础生成的接应代词(如爱尔兰语关系结构中的接应代词)和"补救性代词"(如英语关系结构中的接应代词)。汉语关系结构中也能出现接应代词。那么,汉语关系结构接应代词属于哪一类?本文首先对比英、汉语关系结构接应代词的不同分布规律,以此证明汉语关系结构接应代词不是"补救性代词",然后采用三个经典诊断性证据来证明它是基础生成的接应代词。 Literature indicates that there are essentially three classes of resumptive pronouns:resumptives that are the result of movement,exemplified by Vata relative structures;resumptives that are base-generated,exemplified by Irish wh-questions;and resumptives that are processing artifacts,exemplified by the English 'intrusive pronouns'.There are also resumptive pronouns in Chinese relative structures.Which class do they belong to? This paper first compares the distribution differences between the resumptive pronouns in Chinese relative structures and those in English ones to show that the former are not 'intrusive pronouns' and then adopts three classical pieces of diagnostic evidence to prove that they are base-generated.

作者杨彩梅

机构地区中国社会科学院语言所天津师范大学

出处《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期353-360,436,共8页 Modern Foreign Languages

基金国家社会科学基金项目"生成语法框架下关系结构的句法和一语习得研究"(11FYY007) 中国社会科学院语言研究所创新工程项目"儿童句法习得和认知研究"的资助

关键词接应代词移位基础生成分布诊断

分类号 H314.3 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献25

1Alexiadou, A., P. Law, A. Meinunger & C. Wilder. 2000. Introduction [A]. In A. Alexiadou, P. Law, A. Meinunger & C. Wilder (eds.). The Syntax of Relative Clauses [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1-40.
2Aoun, J. & A. Y-H. Li. 2003. Essays on the Representational and Derivational Nature of Grammar: The Diversity of WH-constructions [M]. Cambridge: MIT Press.
3Asudeh, A. 2004. Resumption as Resource Management [D]. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Stanford: Stanford University.
4Asudeh, A. 2007. Three kinds of resumption[P]. Presented at Resumptive Pronouns at the Interfaces. Paris: University of Paris.
5Bianchi, V. 1999. Consequences of Antisymmetry: Headed Relative Clauses [M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
6Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding [M]. Dordrecht: Foris.
7Chomsky, N. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding [M]. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
8Chomsky, N. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy [A]. In A. Belletti (ed.). Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Volume 3 [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 104-131.
9Engdahl, E. 1983. Parasitic gaps [J]. Linguistic and Philosophy 6: 5-34.
10Engdahl, E. 2001. Versatile parasitic gaps [A]. In P. W. Culicover & P. M. Postal (eds.). Parasitic Gaps [C]. Cambridge: MIT Press, 127-145.