期刊文献+

汉英同传中词汇模式的语料库考察 被引量:24

A corpus-based study on lexical patterns in simultaneous interpreting from Chinese into English
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于自建的香港当代社会生活口译语料库,本文考察Laviosa(1998)提出的译文词汇特征是否在口译语料库中有所体现并解释其原因。研究发现,口译译文中高频词出现的比例高于低频词,且词汇密度要比原生英语低,这表明汉英口译中存在"简化"的翻译共性。但本研究亦发现口译译文在平均词长、平均句长以及名词化方面比原生英语高,这意味着口译译文的正式度、难度和客观度都比原生英语高,这恰与口译译文中"简化"翻译共性的结论相左。我们认为,出现该情况的原因在于口译和笔译存在方法上的本质不同,口译员的自订词汇表及口译职业操守也会产生一定影响。 This paper examines whether Laviosa's(1998) corpus-based findings on vocabulary patterns in translations are evident in the self-developed corpora BICCSL.Our study shows that in interpreted texts,as compared to translational texts,the proportion of high frequency words versus low frequency words is relatively higher,and the lexical density is lower.These two lexical features support 'simplification' universal in interpreting.But the study also reveals that in interpreted texts,the average word length,sentence length and the degree of nominalization are higher,which suggests a more formal,difficult and objective style in interpreted texts.It is proposed that these two contradictory findings result from inherent differences between translation and interpreting,and from interpreters' customized vocabulary lists and professional ethics.
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期409-415,438,共7页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 香港理工大学项目"Building Bilingual Interpreting Corporaon Contemporary Social Life in HongKong"(A-PC1M) 国家社科基金重大项目"大规模英汉平行语料库的建立与加工"(10&ZD127)的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Baker, M. 1993. Corpus linguistics and translation studies: Implication and application [A]. In M. Baker, G. Francis & E. Tognini-Bonelli (eds.). Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 233-250.
  • 2Halliday, M. A. K. 1985. Spoken and Written Language [M]. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
  • 3Hyltenstam, K. 1988. Lexical characteristics of narrative: Second-language learners of Swedish [J]. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 9: 67-84.
  • 4Kenny, D. 2001. Lexis and Creativity in Translation : A Corpus-based Study [ M ]. Manchester: St. Jerome.
  • 5Lauren, U. 2002. Some lexical features of immersion pupils' oral and written narration [A]. Working Papers in Linguistics 50 [C]. Lund: Lund University Press.
  • 6Laviosa, S. 1998. Core patterns of lexicat use in a comparable corpus of English narrative prose -J-. Meta 43, 4: 557-570.
  • 7Laviosa, S. 2002. Corpus-based Translation Studies [M]. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  • 8Olohan, M. 2004. Introducing Corpora in Translation Studies[M]. London: Routledge.
  • 9Russo, M., C. Bendazzoli & A. Sandrelli. 2006. Looking for lexical patterns in a trilingual corpus of source and interpreted speeches: Extended analysis of EPIC [J]. FORUM 4, 1: 221-226.
  • 10Sinclair, J. 1991. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation [M]. New York: Ox ford University Press.

二级参考文献85

同被引文献396

引证文献24

二级引证文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部