期刊文献+

基于能力的类比推理映射转换的实验研究 被引量:2

The Experiment Research on Mapping Transformation of Analogical Reasoning Based on the Capability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 旨在通过交叉映射的实验研究范式,证明存在一种独立于知识经验的基于能力的映射转换过程。研究结果表明:(1)瑞文高级推理测验的第二组题确实要难于第一组题;被试在转换题上的得分低于非转换题上的得分,转换题的设计效果明显,且表明是否需要进行心理上的转换确实影响了被试的解题成绩;不论题目难度的高低都不影响转换与非转换之间的差异。(2)存在着基于能力的映射转换,并且映射转换能力与析出关系能力之间呈中等程度的线性相关。实验可以区分出析出关系能力高、低的被试和转换能力高、低的被试。 The previous researches of analogical mapping mainly concerned the relational transduction process based on knowledge and experience. This article aimed to prove the existence of mapping transformation based on the capability by cross mapping paradigm. is more difficult than the first group The result of mapping transformation shows: problem in Reven advanced reasoning exam. problem is lower than the score of the non-transformation obvious, the difficulty of the problem will not influence based on the capability is existed. It is related with the (1) The the second group problem score of the transformation problem. The design effect of transformation problem is the transformation process. (2) mapping transformation ability of the analysis induce in middling degree. The experiment can distinguish the subjects possessed high ability of analysis and transformation from those possessed low ability of analysis and transformation.
作者 邱琴
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 2012年第6期419-426,共8页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 江西省社会科学"十一五"规划项目(10JY71) 2012年江西省高等学校省级教学改革课题(JXGJ-12-2-12) 江西师范大学博士启动基金项目的资助
关键词 类比推理 映射转换 转换能力 analogical reasoning, mapping transformation, transformation ability.
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1邱琴,胡竹菁.基于概念辨析的类比推理研究的新视角[J].心理学探新,2012,32(4):323-328. 被引量:3
  • 2Clement, C. A., & Gentner, D. (1991) . Systematicity as a selection constraint in analogical mapping. Cognitive Science, 15, 89-132.
  • 3Gentner, D., & Toupin, C. (1986) . Systematicity and surface simi- larity in the development of analogy. Cognitive Science, 10, 277-300.
  • 4Gentner, D. (2003) . Why we're so smart. In: D. Gentner, S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.) , Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 195-235.
  • 5Holyoak, K. J., & Thagard, P. (1995) . Mental leaps: Analogy in creative thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • 6Goswami, U. (1996) . Analogical reasoning and cognitive develop- ment. In: H. Reese (Ed.) , Advances in child development and behavior. CA: Academic Press, 92-135.
  • 7Goswami, U. (2001) . Analogical reasoning in children. In: D. Gen-trier, K. J. Holyoak, B. N. Kokinov (Eds.) , The analogical mind: Perspectives from cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 437-470.
  • 8Halford, G. S. (1993) . Children's Understanding: The development of mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • 9Holyoak, K., & Morrison, R. (2005) . The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Keane, M. T. (1997) . What makes an analogy difficuh? The effects of order and causal structure on analogical mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23 (4) , 946-967.

二级参考文献4

共引文献2

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部