期刊文献+

山区沿河公路路基洪水毁损过程及机理研究 被引量:9

Research on Flood Damage Process and Mechanism of Mountain Area Riverside Highway Subgrade
原文传递
导出
摘要 洪水毁损路基是汛期山区沿河公路的常见病害形式,是河流洪水与公路结构之间相互作用、耦合对抗的表象。以大量山区沿河公路路基洪水毁损的实例为基础,根据山区沿河公路路基洪水毁损的宏观表象,将山区沿河公路路基洪水毁损的过程概化为三个阶段,即洪水对路基的劣化、弱化阶段;路基变形、下沉、潜在破坏面形成阶段;路基毁损破坏阶段。论述了山区沿河公路路基洪水毁损每个阶段的物理特征,指出了各阶段力学分析可采用的基础力学原理。从流固耦合动力学的角度,论述了山区沿河公路路基洪水毁损的机理,认为山区沿河公路路基洪水毁损属于一种被动洪水毁损过程,山区沿河公路路基抗冲蚀能力是该过程的关键控制因素。 Flood damage of subgrade is a kind of common disaster form for mountain area riverside highway, which is the result of interaction between flood and highway structure. Based on a great number of mountain area riverside highway subgrade damage examples, according to the macro-representation of mountain area riverside highway subgrade damaged by flood, the damage process of mountain area river- side highway subgrade damaged by flood is generalized as three stages, namely, the flood-induced highway subgrade degradation and weakening stage; roadbed deformation, sinking, potential sliding plane forma- tion stage; roadbed damage stage. The physical features of every stage of mountain area riverside highway subgrade damage are discussed, the basic mechanics principle of each phase is pointed out. From the point of view of fluid-structure coupling dynamics, the damage mechanism for flood-induced mountain area river- side highway subgrade damage is discussed, it pointed out that the flood-induced subgrade damage belongs to a kind of passive flood damage process, the erosion resistance ability of riverside highway subgrade is the key to the process control factors.
出处 《公路》 北大核心 2012年第11期95-103,共9页 Highway
基金 西部交通建设科技项目 项目编号2009318221035 国家自然科学基金 项目编号41071017
关键词 山区沿河公路 路基 洪水 毁损过程 毁损机理 mountain area riverside highway subgrade flood damage process damage mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

二级参考文献115

共引文献148

同被引文献59

  • 1李帅杰,李昌志,程晓陶.区域洪灾风险评价方法初探——以浙江省为例[J].水利水电技术,2012,43(3):82-87. 被引量:8
  • 2李家春,田伟平,陈建壮.公路边坡水毁灾害等级快速评估方法[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2006,26(2):27-30. 被引量:19
  • 3黄大鹏,刘闯,彭顺风.洪灾风险评价与区划研究进展[J].地理科学进展,2007,26(4):11-22. 被引量:78
  • 4Gardenr J S, Dekens J. Mountain hazards and the resilience of social-ecological systems : Lessons learned in India and Canada[J]. Natural Hazards,2007,41:317 -336.
  • 5Mohammadkhan S, Ahmadi H, Jafari M. Relationship between soil erosion, slop, parent material, and distance to road - - Case study: Latian Watershed, Iran[J]. Arabian Journal of Geoseiences, 2012,4(1/2) :311 - 338.
  • 6XIA Jun-qiang, Falconer R A, LIN Bin-liang, et al. Numerical assessment of flood hazard risk to people and vehicales in flash fioods[J]. Environmental Modelling,2011,26:987 - 998.
  • 7牛思胜.沿河公路路基冲刷深度的计算[J].公路,2004(8):72-75.
  • 8Youssef M A, Pradhan B, Hassan A M. Flash flood risk estimation along the St. Katherine road, southern Sinai, Egypt using GIS based morphometry and satel- lite imagery[J]. Environ Earth Sei, 2010, 62(3): 611-623.
  • 9Mohammadkhan S, Ahmadi H, Jafari M. Relationship between soil erosion, slop, parent material, and dis- tance to road(Case study: Latian Watershed, Iran) [J]. ArahJ Geosci, 2012,4(1-2):311 -338.
  • 10SINHA R,BAPALU G V,SINGH L K, et al. Flood risk analysis in the kosi river basin, north bihar using multi-parametric approach of analytical hierarchy process(AHP) [J]. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 2008,36 : 335 - 349.

引证文献9

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部