期刊文献+

不同浓度的蔗糖溶液快速冻存人类精子的实验研究 被引量:2

Ultra-rapid cryopreservation of human spermatozoa with different concentrations of sucrose
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨使用非渗透性冷冻保护剂蔗糖快速冻存人类精子的可行性。方法:收集正常精液标本40份,经上游法处理后,收集上游精子悬液,分成6份,1份作为对照,其余5份分别用常规精子冷冻法,0.15、0.20、0.25、0.30 mol/L蔗糖溶液冷冻精子,复苏后比较6组精子活动率、前向运动精子活动率及精子质膜完整性。结果:所有冷冻组复苏后精子活动率、前向运动精子活动率及膜完整率与冷冻前上游组(96.2±1.8)%,(93.8±2.8)%,(99.0±0.8)%比较均显著下降,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。精子活动率结果:蔗糖冷冻组之间比较,0.20 mol/L组解冻后精子活动率高于0.15、0.25、0.30 mol/L组,分别为(55.5±6.3)%、(45.9±6.6)%、(50.4±9.4)%、(45.5±11.2)%,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。0.20、0.25 mol/L蔗糖冷冻组与常规慢速冷冻组(53.6±5.0)%比较,差异均无显著性(P>0.05);0.15、0.30 mol/L蔗糖组均低于常规慢速冷冻组(P<0.05)。前向运动精子活动率结果:0.20 mol/L蔗糖冷冻组与常规冷冻组比较差异无显著性[(44.4±7.4)%vs(42.3±8.1)%,P>0.05];以上两组均高于0.15、0.25、0.30 mol/L蔗糖冷冻组,分别为(37.1±8.3)%、(33.1±9.2)%、(22.0±9.1)%,差异有显著性(P<0.05)。精子膜完整率结果:0.20 mol/L蔗糖冷冻组(70.1±6.9)%高于常规冷冻组、0.15、0.25、0.30 mol/L蔗糖冷冻组,分别为(63.1±6.8)%、(57.7±8.3)%、(63.5±10.7)%、(57.8±12.9)%,差异有显著性(P<0.05);常规冷冻组与0.15、0.25、0.30 mol/L蔗糖冷冻组比较差异无显著性(P>0.05)。结论:终浓度为0.20 mol/L的蔗糖溶液作为人类精子冷冻保护剂是可行的,快速冷冻方法简便、快速、经济、安全有效。 Objective: To explore the feasibility of ultra-rapid freezing of human spermatozoa in the cryogenic vial with different concentrations of sucrose solution. Methods : We divided 40 normal semen samples prepared with the routine swim-up technique into 6 aliquots, 1 as the control and the other 5 cryopreserved with sucrose solution at the concentrations of 0.15,0.20, 0.25 and 0.30 mol/L, respectively. After thawing, we determined and compared the motility, progressive motility and plasma membrane integrity of the sperm among the 6 groups. Results : The motility, progressive motility and plasma membrane integrity of the sperm were signifi- cantly lower after thawing than before cryopreservation ( [ 96.2± 1.8 ] %, [ 93.8 ± 2.8 ] % and [ 99.0 ± 0.8 ] % ) ( P 〈 0.05 ). Post- thawing sperm motility was (55.5 ± 6.3) % in the 0.20 mol/L sucrose group, significantly higher than in the 0.15, O. 25 and 0.30 mol/L groups ( [ 45.9 ± 6.6 ] %, [ 50.4 ± 9.4 ] % and [ 45.5 ±11.2 ] % ) (P 〈 0.05 ), and it was (53.6 ±5.0) % in the conven- tional freezing group, with no statistically significant difference from the O. 20 and O. 25 mol/L sucrose cryopreservation groups (P 〉 O. 05 ), but remarkably higher than in the 0.15 and O. 30 mol/L groups ( P 〈 O. 05). Post-thawing progressive sperm motility exhibited no statistically significant differences between the 0.20 mol/L sucrose and conventional freezing groups ( [44.4 ± 7.4] % vs [42. 3 ± 8.1 ] %, P 〉 0.05 ), but markedly higher in both than in the 0.15, 0.25 and 0.30 mol/L suerose groups ( [ 37.1 ± 8.3 ] %, [ 33.1±9.2 ] % and [ 22.0± 9.1 ] % ) ( P 〈 0.05 ). Post-thawing plasma membrane integrity was significantly higher in the 0.20 mol/L su- crose eryopreservation group ( [ 70.1 ± 6.9 ] % ) than in either the conventional freezing group ( [ 63.1 ± 6.8 ] % ) or the 0.15, 0.25 and0.30 mol/L sucrose groups ([57.7±8.31%, [63.5±10.71% and [57.8±12.91%) (P〈0.05). Conclusion: Asasim- ple, safe and effective method, ultra-rapid freezing with sucrose solution at the final concentration of 0.20 mol/L can be used for the cryopreservation of human spermatozoa.
出处 《中华男科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2012年第11期1009-1013,共5页 National Journal of Andrology
关键词 精子 蔗糖 冷冻保存 精子膜完整性 精子活动率 spermatozoa sucrose cryopreservation plasma membrane integrity motility
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1胡京美,许成岩,李媛,卢少明,王丽,陈子江.不同冷冻保护剂对人类精子冷冻复苏后活动能力的影响[J].中华男科学杂志,2008,14(1):23-25. 被引量:6
  • 2Kim S, Lee Y J, Ji DB, et al. Evaluation of different cryopro- tectants (CPAs) in boar semencryopreservation. J Vet Med Sci, 2011, 73(7): 961-963.
  • 3McClean R, MacCalium C, Blyde D, et al. Ultrastructure, os- motic tolerance, glycerol toxicity and cryopreservation of caput and cauda epididymidal kangaroo spermatozoa. Reprod Fertil Dev, 2006, 18(4) : 469-476.
  • 4Kopeika J, Kopeika E, Zhang T, et al. Studies on the toxicity of dimethyl sulfoxide, ethylene glycol, methanol and glycerol to loach (Misgurnus fossilis) sperm and the effect on subsequent embryo development. Cryo Letters, 2003, 24(6) : 365-374.
  • 5Macias Garcia B, Ortega Ferrusola C, Aparicio IM, et a/. Toxicity of glycerol for the stallion spermatozoa: Effects on membrane in- tegrity and cytoskeleton, lipid peroxidation and mitochondrial membrane potential. Theriogenology, 2012, 77 ( 7 ) : 1280- 1289.
  • 6Isachenko E, Isachenko V, Weiss JM, et al. Acrosomal status and mitochondrial activity of human spermatozoa vitrified with su- crose. Reproduction, 2008, 136(2) : 167-173.
  • 7Isachenko V, Maettner R, Petrunkina AM, et aL Vitrification of human ICSI/IVF spermatozoa without cryoprotectants: New Cap- illary Technology. J Androl, 2011, 33(3) : 462-468.
  • 8谷翊群,陈振文,卢文红,等译.世界卫生组织著.人类精液检查与处理实验室手册.第5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011.144-145.
  • 9Harrison RA, ickers SE. Use of fluorescent probes to assess mem- brane integrity in mammalian spermatozoa. J Reprod Fertil, 1990, 88(1) : 343-352.
  • 10Bagchi A, Woods E J, Critser JK. Cryopreservation and vitrifica- tion: Recent advances in fertility preservation technologies. Ex-pert Rev Med Devices, 2008, 5(3) : 359-370.

二级参考文献29

  • 1黄东晖,赵虎,熊承良,沈继云,周洁玲.白蛋白与卵黄联合应用于人类精液冷冻保存的研究[J].中华男科学杂志,2006,12(2):115-119. 被引量:8
  • 2蒋凌英,靳镭,朱桂金,任新玲,刘群,魏玉兰,胡娟.精子冷冻环无保护剂玻璃化冷冻方法的初步研究[J].生殖医学杂志,2006,15(4):234-236. 被引量:9
  • 3世界卫生组织.人类精液及精子-宫颈粘液相互作用实验室检验手册.第4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2001:6-96.
  • 4Desai NN, Blaekmon H, Goldfarb J. Single sperm cryopreservation on cryoloops: An alternative to hamster zona for freezing individual spermatozoa. Reprod Biomed Online, 2004, 9( 1 ) : 47-53.
  • 5Isachenko V, Isachenko E, Katkov II, et al. Cryoprotectant-free cryopreservation of human spermatozoa by vitrification and freezing in vapor: Effect on motility, DNA integrity, and fertilization ability. Biol Reprod, 2004, 71 (4) : 1167-1173.
  • 6Schuster TG, Keller LM, Dunn RL, et al. Ultra-rapid freezing of very low numbers of sperm using cryo|oops. Hum Reprod, 2003, 18 ( 4 ) : 788-795.
  • 7Isachenko E, Isachenko V, Katkov II, et al. DNA integrity and motility of human spermatozoa after standard slow freezing versus cryoprotectant-free vitrification. Hum Reprod, 2004, 19 (4) : 932 -939.
  • 8Donoso P, Tournaye H, Devroey P. Which is the best sperm retrieval technique for non-obstructive azoospermia? A systematic review. Hum Reprod Update, 2007, 13 (6) : 539-549.
  • 9Bagchi A, Woods EJ, Critser JK. Cryopreservation and vitrification: Recent advances in fertility preservation technologies. Expert Rev Med Devices, 2008, 5 (3) : 359-370.
  • 10Isachenko E, lsachenko V, Katkov II, et al. Vitrification of mammalian spermatozoa in the absence of cryoprotectmlts: From past practical difficulties to present success. Reprod Biomed Online, 2003, 6(2) : 191-200.

共引文献30

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部