期刊文献+

结直肠癌患者营养不良评估及其与术后并发症的相关研究 被引量:32

Relationship of nutritional risk screening and postoperative complications in patients with colorectal carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨结直肠癌营养不良风险的相关因素,分析营养风险筛查与术后并发症的关系。方法:95例结直肠癌患者术前依据营养风险筛查(NRS-2002)评分结果分为营养良好组及营养不良风险组,分析营养不良及与临床病理资料的关系。结果:40例(42.1%)属于营养不良风险组,营养不良风险与年龄、肠梗阻、患病时限、肿瘤分期以及肿瘤组织分级相关,P值均<0.05。术前未能行营养支持的营养不良风险患者术后并发症明显多于营养良好组(P<0.05),围手术期予以20~25kcal/kg(1kcal=4.186 8kJ)的营养支持可显著降低术后并发症发生率,P<0.05。结论:结直肠癌患者术前并发营养不良的风险较高,围手术期给予营养支持可有效减少术后并发症。 OBJECTIVE: To investigate the factors of nutritional risk and its affection to postoperative outcomes in patients with colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: According to the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) the clinic and pathologic data of 95 cases with colorectal malignant lesions were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: According to NRS-2OO2,there were 40 cases (42. 1%) who were grouped as nutrition risk team. The factors presented relationship with nutrition risk were as follows: age, bowel obstruction, length with disease, stage of tumor, and differentiated class (P〈0.05). The incidence of postoperative complication was higher in nutritional risk team than that in good nutrition team (P〈0.05). Poor perioperative nutritional support of 20-25 kcal/kg (1 kcal=4. 186 8 kJ) and significant body weight reduce increased the incidence of the complications (P〈0.05). CONCLUSION: The incidence of malnutrition risk is higher in cases with colorectal carcinoma,and perioperative nutritional support may reduce postoperative complication.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第14期1106-1108,共3页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 结直肠肿瘤 营养调查 营养支持 手术后并发症 colorectal neoplasms nutrition surveys nutritional support postoperative complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献17

  • 1张传珉,杨华伟,杨南武,陈建思,陈汉华.拉下法在中下段直肠癌保肛治疗术中的应用[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2006,13(7):539-540. 被引量:3
  • 2郑民华,冯波.再谈腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的根治性问题[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(19):1300-1302. 被引量:8
  • 3郁宝铭.进一步提高直肠癌疗效的策略[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2007,14(2):81-84. 被引量:10
  • 4万德森.结直肠癌外科治疗若干热点问题[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2007,14(8):561-563. 被引量:23
  • 5Mirza M S,Longman R J,Farrokhyar F,et al. Long-term outomes for laparoscopic versus open resection of nonmetastatic coloreetal cancer [J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2008,18(5):679-685.
  • 6Aziz O,Constantinides V, Tekkis PP, et al. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer:a meta-analysis[J]. Ann Surg Oncol,2006,13(3) :413-424.
  • 7Koopmann M C, Heise C P. Laparoscopic and minimally invar sivresection of malignant colorectal disease[J]. Surg Clin North AM,2008,88(5) : 1047-1072.
  • 8BuunenM,Veldkamp R,HopW C,et al. Survival after laparoseopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer:long term outcome of a randomized clinical trial[J].Lancet Oncol,2009, 10(1):44-52.
  • 9Fleshman J,Sargent D J,Green E,et al. Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 3-year data from the COST Study Group trial[J]. Ann Surg,2007,246(4) :655-662.
  • 10JayneDG,Guillou P J,ThorpeH,et al. Randomized trial oflaparoseopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2007,25(21):3061-3068.

共引文献97

同被引文献343

引证文献32

二级引证文献224

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部