期刊文献+

咽喉反流症状指数量表中文版的信度及效度评价 被引量:97

Chinese version of the reflux symtom index was evaluated for reliability and validity
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨中文版咽喉反流症状指数(Reflux symtomindex,RSI)量表的信度、效度及临床价值。方法自行引进并将RSI量表翻译成中文。门诊接受中文版RSI量表评估患者107例,其中疑诊患咽喉反流性疾病(1aryngopharyngeal reflux disease,LPRD)者72例,非疑诊者35例,1周后均再次填写量表。疑诊患者中的41例和非疑诊患者中的13例(共54例)接受24h咽喉pH检测。经pH检测确诊LPRD患者34例,其中30例给予药物治疗,3个月后再次填写RSI量表。结果RSI量表内部一致性信度分析Cronbaeh’s0/.系数为0.715;重测信度采用Spearman相关分析,各条目及总分的相关系数为0.750—0.971。以pH检测作为诊断LPRD的金标准,RSI量表诊断符合率66.7%,阳性预测值80.8%;区分效度采用两个独立样本Wilcoxon检验,RSI总分比较Z=-3.266,P=0.001,差异有统计学意义。LPRD患者治疗前后自身对照符号秩和检验,各条目与总分的P值均〈0.05,差异均有统计学意义。结论RSI量表中文版具有良好的信度和效度,可作为LPRD诊断的初筛,也可用于LPRD患者治疗后评估疗效的辅助工具。 Objective To investigate the reliability, validity and clinical value of Chinese version of the reflux symptom index(RSI). Methods xThe Chinese version of RSI scale was used in ENT outpatient department. There were one hundred and seven patients, including thirty-five patients with common throat diseases (non-suspected) and seventy-two patients with clinically suspected throat reflux. All 107 patients were asked to complete the two scales one on the first-visiting and one after one week. Thirteen patients with common throat diseases (non-suspected) and forty-one with suspected throat reflux also received RSI testing. Among the thirty-four confirmed acid reflux disease patients, thirty patients received pharmaceutical treatments and self-performed post-RSI testing after three months. Results The RSI Scale internal reliability consistency included the test-retest reliability(0. 715-0.971 ) , discriminant validity and construct validity. RSI total targeting percentage was 66.7% , targeting percentage was 80.8%. Discriminant validity was confirmed using 2 independent samples Wilcoxon test, with RSI total score compared to Z = - 3. 266, P = 0. 001. The before and after treatment self-control ehi-square test ( P 〈 0.05 ), the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion RSI Simplified Chinese version has good reliability and validity, and can be used for laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) diagnostic screening along with the efficacy for the treatment of patients with appropriate LPRD aids.
出处 《中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第11期894-898,共5页 Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
基金 首都发展基金(2009-3035)
关键词 问卷调查 胃食管反流 疾病严重程度指数 可重复性 结果 Questionnaires Gastroesophageal reflux Severity of illness index Reproducibility of results
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Koufman JA. Laryngopharyngeal reflux 2002: a new paradigm of airway disease. Ear Nose Throat J, 2002, 81 (9 Suppl 2) : 2-6.
  • 2Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Amin MR, et al. Symptoms and findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Ear Nose Throat J, 2002, 81 (9 Suppl 2) : 10-13.
  • 3Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice, 2002, 16: 274-277.
  • 4李进让,陈曦.咽喉反流性疾病//韩德民.2006耳鼻咽喉头颈外科新进展.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:288-304.
  • 5Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. The validity and reliability of the reflux finding score (RFS). Laryngoscope, 2011, 111:1313-1317.
  • 6Park KH, Choi SM, Kwon SU, et al. Diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux among globus patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2006, 134: 81-85.
  • 7Knight J, Lively MO, Johnston N, et al. Sensitive pepsin immunoassay for detection of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Laryngoscope, 2005, 115: 1473-1478.
  • 8Karkos PD, Wilson JA. Empiric treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux with proton pump inhibitors : a systematic review. Laryngoscope, 2006, 116: 144-148.
  • 9Nostrant TT. Gastroesophageal reflux and laryngitis: a skeptic's view. Am J Med, 2000, 108 Suppl 4a: 149s-152s.
  • 10Harrill WC, Stasney CR, Donovan DT. Laryngopharyngeal reflux : a possible risk factor in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1999, 120: 598-601.

二级参考文献15

  • 1Adams J, Heintz P, Gross N, et al. Acid/pepsin promotion of carcinogenesis in the hamster cheek pouch. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2000, 126 : 405-409.
  • 2Koufman JA. The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) : a clinical investigalion of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury. Laryngoscope, 1991 101 (4 Pt 2 Suppl 53 ) : 1-78.
  • 3Koufman JA, Burke AJ. The etiology and pathogenesis of laryngeal carcinoma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 1997, 30: 1-19.
  • 4Payne R J, Kost KM, Frenkiel S, et al. Laryngeal inflammation assessed using the reflux finding score in obstructive sleep apnea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2006, 134: 836-842.
  • 5Koufman JA. Laryngopharyngeal reflux 2002: a new paradigm of airway disease. Ear Nose Throat J, 2002, 81 (9 Suppl 2) : 2-6.
  • 6Ulualp SO, Toohill R J, Hoffmann R, et al. Pharyngeal pH monitoring in patients with posterior laryngitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1999, 120: 672-677.
  • 7Harding SM, Guzzo MR, Richter JE. 24-h esophageal pH testing in asthmatics : respiratory symptom correlation with esophageal acid events. Chest, 1999, 115: 654-659.
  • 8Ford CN. Evaluation and management of laryngopharyngeal reflux. JAMA, 2005, 294: 1534-1540.
  • 9Belafaky PC, Postma GN, Amin MR, et al. Symptoms and findings of laryngopharyngeal reflux. Ear Nose Throat J, 2002, 81 (9 Suppl 2) : 10-13.
  • 10Belafsky PC, Postma GN, Koufman JA. Validity and reliability of the reflux symptom index (RSI). J Voice, 2002, 16: 274-277.

共引文献39

同被引文献850

引证文献97

二级引证文献684

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部