期刊文献+

盐酸环喷托酯滴眼液散瞳和麻痹睫状肌效果和安全性的临床研究 被引量:2

Clinical Research on Efficacy and Safety of Cyclopentolate Hydrochloride Eye Drops in Mydriasis and Paralysis of Ciliary Muscle
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价盐酸环喷托酯滴眼液的疗效及安全性。方法采用多中心随机双盲阳性药平行对照试验。结果试验药麻痹睫状肌的效应强于对照药托吡卡胺滴眼液,持续时间长。而试验药散瞳效应慢于对照药,但持续时间较长,给药后75 min试验药与对照药的散瞳效应相当。试验组和对照组的不良反应主要表现为结膜轻度充血和分泌物轻度增多。试验组和对照组发生率均为1.7%(刺激积分2分及以上均为2例),两组比较差异无统计学意义。试验组和对照组均无明显升高正常人群眼压的作用。结论盐酸环喷托酯滴眼液在眼科检查中的散瞳和麻痹睫状肌的效果肯定,耐受性好,安全性高,值得临床推广应用,特别是其麻痹睫状肌的作用较强,持续时间不超过48 h,特别适合需麻痹睫状肌功能的眼科检查。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Cyclopentolate Hydrochloride Eye Drops with commercial Tropicamide Eye Drops as control. Methods A multicenter, randomized, double-blind positive-controlled trial was adopted. Results Compared with tropicamide, cyclopentolate hydrochloride showed a longer and stronger effect on paralysis of ciliary muscle, and a longer mydriatic effect with slower onset. At 75 min after administration, the equivalent mydriatic effects were observed. The adverse reactions for cyclopentolate or tropicamide mainly included mild conjunctival hyperemia and slight increase of secretions. The incidences both were 1.7%( 2 case with stimulating points ≥2) without statistically significant difference. Besides, remarkably increased intraocular pressure was not observed for cyclopentolate or tropicamide. Conclusion In mydriasis and paralysis of ciliary muscle, Cyclopentolate Hydrochloride Eye Drops has good efficacy and tolerance, high safety for clinical application, especially stronger paralytic effect on ciliary muscle inside 48 h is more suitable for eye examination with paralysis of ciliary muscle.
出处 《食品与药品》 CAS 2012年第11期403-406,共4页 Food and Drug
关键词 盐酸环喷托酯滴眼液 托吡卡胺滴眼液 散瞳 麻痹睫状肌 Cyclopentolate Hydrochloride Eye Drops Tropicamide Eye Drops mydriasis paralysis of ciliary muscle
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Milder B. Tropicamide as a cycloplegic agent[J]. Arch Ophthalmol, 1961, 66: 70-72.
  • 2Gordon D M, Ehrenberg M H. Cyclopentolate hydrochloride: A new mydriatic and cycloplegic agent; a pharmacologic and clinical evaluation[J]. Am J Ophthalmol, 1954, 38(6): 831-838.
  • 3Schlossman A. An evaluation of a new cycloplegic: cyclopentolate[J]. Eye Ear Nose Throat Mon, 1956, 35(2): 126-127.
  • 4Thomas M C, Caissial C. Cycloplegia induced by cyclopentolate in the examination of refraction[J]. Bull Soc Ophthalmol Fr, 1974, 74(5-6): 621-631.
  • 5郑康铿.单纯屈光不正青少年用复方托品酰胺滴眼液与阿托品眼膏散瞳验光的对比分析[J].河北医药,2009,31(3):294-295. 被引量:6

二级参考文献1

共引文献5

同被引文献38

  • 1MalgorzataR, Dorota M, Nowak. IGF - 1 gene polymorphisms in Polish fam- ilies with high - grade myopia [ J ]. Molecular vision, 2011,8 ( 17 ) : 184 - 189.
  • 2TrineL, Patricia M, Riddell. Accommodative instability: relationship to pro- gression of early onset myopia[J]. Clinical & experimental optometry: jour- nal of the Australian Optometrical Association, 2012,95 (2) : 162 - 166.
  • 3AA, Rushood, S, Azmat, M, Shariq. Ocular disorders among schoolchildren in Khartoum State, Sudan[J]. Eastern Mediterranean health journal = La revue de sant6 de la Mditerran6e orientale, 2013,19 (3): 51 -56.
  • 4Heifer KJ, Shammas HJ, Savini G. Comparison of 2 laser instruments for measuring axial length[J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2010,36 (4) : 644-648.
  • 5Santodomingo-Rubido J, Mallen EAH, Gilmartin B, et al. A new non-contact optical device for ocular biometry[J]. Br J Ophthalmol, 2002,86 (4) :458-462.
  • 6Carkeet A, Saw SM, Gazzard G, et al. Repeatability of IOLMaster biometry in children[J]. Optom Vis Sci,2004,81(11): 829-834.
  • 7Vogel A, Dick HB, Krummenauer F. Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry: intraobserver and interobserver reliability[J]. J Cataract Refr act Surg,2001, 27 (12) : 1961-1968.
  • 8Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Shah S, et al. A new optical low coherence reflectometry device for ocular biometry in cataract patients[J]. Br J Ophthalmol,2009,93(7):949-953.
  • 9Cruysberg LPJ, Doors M, Verbakel F, et al. Evaluation of the Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometer[J]. Br J Ophthalmol,2010, 94(1) : 106-110.
  • 10Zhao J, Chen Z, Zhou ZM, et al. Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non-contact biometric devices in myopes[J]. Clin Exp Optom,2013,96 (1): 92-99.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部